Characterization of acute residual pulmonary vein connections using electroanatomic mapping during pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation
- PMID: 40582685
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.06.037
Characterization of acute residual pulmonary vein connections using electroanatomic mapping during pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation
Abstract
Background: Single-shot pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheters show promising safety and efficacy for achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, additional PFA applications are sometimes required after standard PFA delivery to achieve PVI.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world frequency and location of acute residual pulmonary vein (PV) connections using 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM) during index PFA.
Methods: Patients undergoing index PVI with a single-shot PFA catheter and receiving postablation 3D-EAM were prospectively studied. First-pass isolation (FPI) rates and distribution of residual PV connections were assessed.
Results: A total of 535 patients from 48 international centers (89 operators) were included (paroxysmal AF 375; persistent AF 160). Mean procedure time was 75.9 ± 31.9 minutes, and mapping time was 8.4 ± 5.2 minutes. Ablation was performed with a pentaspline, variable conformation PFA catheter in 72.7% of cases and a fixed-loop PFA catheter in 27.3%. Bilateral FPI was achieved in 75.1% of patients (paroxysmal AF 77.1% vs persistent AF 70.6%; P = .126). The individual PV FPI rate was 92.7% (1834 of 1978 PVs). Excluding common PVs, residual PV connections were more frequent in superior PVs (superior 8.9% vs inferior 3.8%; P < .001), specifically in the left superior PV (10.1%). Predictors of FPI included standard 4-vein anatomy (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.07; P = .021) and the pentaspline catheter (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.81-6.87; P < .001).
Conclusion: Using 3D-EAM, an acute residual connection of at least 1 PV was observed in a quarter of patients after standard PFA delivery and was most common in the left superior PV. Potential mechanisms include reversible electroporation, highlighting the potential need for additional lesions and the value of a mandatory post-PFA "waiting period."
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Electroporation; Mapping; Pulmonary vein isolation; Pulsed-field ablation; Reconnection.
Copyright © 2025 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure P.S. is a member of advisory board for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) MedTech, and Medtronic. J.D. received consulting fees and honoraria from Abbott and Boston Scientific. H.D. serves as a consultant for Abbott and received speaker fees from Medtronic. A.B. received institutional grants from Biotronik and Boston Scientific and speaker fees from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. F.T. is a minority shareholder of Capio Arytmi Center Stockholm. D.G. received institutional research grants from J&J MedTech, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic and speaker fees from Boston Scientific. V.L. received support from the UK National Institute for Health Research scholarship award, speaker fees from Boston Scientific and J&J MedTech, and research grants from J&J MedTech. N.D. and E.W. are salaried employees of Abbott. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;68(4):877-884. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-01981-5. Epub 2025 Feb 3. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025. PMID: 39899143 Free PMC article.
-
Repeat procedures after pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: MANIFEST-REDO study.Europace. 2025 Aug 4;27(8):euaf012. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf012. Europace. 2025. PMID: 39824172 Free PMC article.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring Follow-Up: ADVANTAGE AF Phase 2.Circulation. 2025 Jul 8;152(1):27-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074485. Epub 2025 Apr 24. Circulation. 2025. PMID: 40273320 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-Analysis of Thermal Versus Pulse Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Durability in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From Repeat Ablation.Clin Cardiol. 2025 Jun;48(6):e70151. doi: 10.1002/clc.70151. Clin Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40437855 Free PMC article.
-
National workflow experience with pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation: learning curve, efficiency, and safety.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;67(9):2127-2136. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01835-6. Epub 2024 May 30. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 38814525 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials