Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 13:6:1578911.
doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1578911. eCollection 2025.

Assessment of burden and needs of family caregivers for the elderly, a scoping review

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of burden and needs of family caregivers for the elderly, a scoping review

Elodie Le Toullec et al. Front Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers play a central role in supporting older adults. Their role is complex and challenging. Their assessment is essential for planning support systems. This review aims to catalog the different scales, identify the spectrum of dimensions they cover, and evaluate their psychometric quality, with the aim of reflecting on potential clinical recommendations.

Method: A systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, google scholar and CINAHL databases identified tools for measuring family caregiver engagement. Two reviewers selected relevant studies using predefined criteria. Keywords included "family caregivers," "engagement," "measurement," and "psychometrics." Extracted data was analyzed for reliability, validity, and other psychometric properties.

Results: We identified 140 articles, 38 of which were analyzed, utilizing 29 different scales to assess caregiver support across various dimensions such as burden, stress, or needs. Clinimetric assessment using an abbreviated COSMIN checklist revealed significant variability in the reliability and validity of these scales, with only 2 meeting clinical research standards. Notable deficiencies were found in internal consistency, reproducibility, and construct validity. None of the scales cover the entire range of complex dimensions associated with family caregivers.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need for improved measurement tools tailored to the complexities of caregiver engagement. Future work should focus on developing more refined scales that better capture the diverse needs of family caregivers to enhance support.

Keywords: assessment; burden; chronic stress; elderly; family caregivers; needs; psychometric properties; wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart, articles selection.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abdul Wahab P., Abdul Talib N. A., Nik Mohd Hatta N. N. K., Saidi S., Mulud Z. A., Abdul Wahab M. N., et al. (2024). The caregiving burden of older people with functional deficits and associated factors on Malaysian family caregivers. Malays. J. Med. Sci. MJMS 31 (1), 161–171. 10.21315/mjms2024.31.1.14 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agir pour les aidants (2023). Ministère du Travail, de la Santé, des Solidarités et des Familles. Available online at: https://solidarites.gouv.fr/agir-pour-les-aidants (Accessed May 27, 2025).
    1. Alam S., Hannon B., Zimmermann C. (2022). Palliative care for family caregivers. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 38 (9), 926–936. 10.1200/JCO.19.00018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amieva H., Rullier L., Bouisson J., Dartigues J., Dubois O., Salamon R. (2012). Needs and expectations of Alzheimer's disease family caregivers. Revue d’Épidémiologie de Santé Publique 60 (3), 231–238. 10.1016/j.respe.2011.12.136 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bamford C., Gregson B., Farrow G., Buck D., Dowswell T., Mcnamee P., et al. (1998). Mental and physical frailty in older people: the costs and benefits of informal care. Ageing Soc. 18 (3), 317–354. 10.1017/S0144686X98006977 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources