Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025;221(5):60.
doi: 10.1007/s11214-025-01185-3. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

The Tandem Reconnection and Cusp Electrodynamics Reconnaissance Satellites (TRACERS) Mission Design

Affiliations
Review

The Tandem Reconnection and Cusp Electrodynamics Reconnaissance Satellites (TRACERS) Mission Design

S M Petrinec et al. Space Sci Rev. 2025.

Abstract

The detailed study of the global characteristics of collisionless magnetic reconnection that occurs at the magnetopause will be greatly enhanced by observations of plasma fluxes and fields within the low-altitude cusp region, as sampled by two spacecraft orbiting in tandem. The NASA Tandem Reconnection and Cusp Electrodynamics Reconnaissance Satellites (TRACERS) mission, a Heliophysics Small Explorer (SMEX) mission, will provide the necessary observations to enable significant progress to be made on understanding magnetic reconnection, especially in terms of its temporal versus spatial characteristics. This paper provides an overview of the TRACERS mission design and the trade studies conducted for the optimization of this design.

Keywords: Cusp; Magnetic reconnection; Region of interest; Sun-synchronous orbits; TRACERS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest StatementThere are no conflicts of interest in this submission.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sample northern hemisphere cusp regions (bounded in red), determined from the model described by Eqs. 1–4 and mapped within the science ROI in geomagnetic coordinates, for various IMF and dipole tilt angle values. Local noon (12 MLT) is toward the bottom of each panel. The Low-Latitude Boundary Layer (LLBL) region and the plasma mantle region bounding the high latitude edge are not included in this model cusp. This set of figures illustrates much of the range of variability in the location of the low-altitude cusp as a function of solar wind conditions and Earth’s dipole tilt angle (season)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Top: Tallies of northern cusp crossings by the TRACERS spacecraft as a function of LTDN for Sun-synchronous orbits, and as a function of prime mission duration (red: 6 months; blue: 1 year; black: 2 years). Bottom: Schematic of three sample Sun-synchronous orbits at 588 km altitude (red: 06:00 LTDN; yellow: 10:30 LTDN; blue: 02:30 LTDN). In addition to the low-altitude cusp location dependences on the solar wind and dipole tilt, the number of anticipated northern cusp crossings by TRACERS is strongly dependent on the orbit configuration during the mission
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TRACERS trajectories for a 10:30 LTDN, 588 km altitude SSO through the northern polar region over the course of a day (15 April), as viewed from above the north Geographic Pole. Each panel illustrates a pass by TRACERS through the science ROI (annular segment). Contours within the ROI indicate the probability of cusp presence at each point along the trajectory
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic of projected IGRF vectors (purple) along an example 10:30 LTDN TRACERS pass through the science ROI. The largest component of each IGRF vector is into the page (i.e. pointing downward into the ionosphere). The orbit Local Aggregate B-field (LABF) (blue arrow) represents the average B-field direction along the trajectory within the ROI. The LABF vector is informative for aligning the TRACERS spacecraft for cusp sampling
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Projections (ECI coordinates) of orbit-by-orbit LABF unit vectors over the course of a single day. Top left: Projections into the XZECI plane. Top middle: Projections into the YZECI plane. Top right: Projections into the XYECI plane (vector endpoints only). The largest component of these unit vectors is in the −ZECI direction. Bottom: XYECI plane projections of orbit-by-orbit LABF unit vectors for four separate days (one for each season) over the course of a year. The changing LABF unit vector is informative for spacecraft pointing operations
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Top panel: Projections into the XYECI plane of the orbit-by-orbit LABF unit vectors over the course of a single day (red markers and trace). Example scenario of attitude repointing of the TRACERS spin axis every four orbits (blue markers). Bottom panel: Histogram of the number of cusp crossings as a function of the angle between the spacecraft spin axis and the IGRF at the center of the cusp, for the scenario of repointing every four orbits, over a mission lifetime of two years. The cusp location is determined from the model described in Sect. 3, parameterized by the OMNI solar wind data set advanced in time by one solar cycle (11 years)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Same as Fig. 6, but for a single spacecraft attitude repointing per day, defined by a daily ‘centroid’ LABF unit vector.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Comparison of repointing intervals on the alignment of the spacecraft spin axis to the LABF vector within the ROI. Accumulated histograms of the described spacecraft repointing histograms. A conservative once-daily repointing strategy of the TRACERS spacecraft spin axis is sufficient to achieve the TRACERS science goals while significantly simplifying operations
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Left: The angle α, between the vector pointing towards the Sun and the LABF unit vector. Right: The variation of α over the course of a year for a 10:30 LTDN Sun-synchronous orbit. This single parameter informs the solar incidence upon satellite surfaces (especially solar panels) during the prime mission
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Left: The angle ϕ, representing the deflection of the daily LABF unit vector out of the orbit plane. Right: The variation of ϕ over the course of a year for a 10:30 LTDN Sun-synchronous orbit. This deflection angle is small and varies slowly during the prime mission

References

    1. Acuña MH, Ogilvie KW, Baker DN, Curtis SA, Fairfield DH, Mish WH (1995) The Global Geospace Science program and its investigations. Space Sci Rev 71:5–21. 10.1007/BF00751323
    1. Asai K, Maezawa K, Kaya N, Mukai T (1999) Latitudinal displacement of cusp ion precipitation: Akebono observations. Adv Space Res 23:1761–1764. 10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00385-3
    1. Burch JL (1968) Low-energy electron fluxes at latitudes above the auroral zone. J Geophys Res 73:3585–3591. 10.1029/JA073i011p03585
    1. Burch JL (1972) Precipitation of low energy electrons at high latitudes: effects of interplanetary magnetic field and dipole tilt angle. J Geophys Res 77:6696–6707. 10.1029/JA077i034p06696
    1. Burch JL (1973) Rate of erosion of dayside magnetic flux based on a quantitative study of the dependence of polar cusp latitude on the interplanetary magnetic field. Radio Sci 8:955–961. 10.1029/RS008i011p00955

LinkOut - more resources