Facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work for cancer survivors: A systematic review
- PMID: 40584725
- PMCID: PMC12205840
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100734
Facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work for cancer survivors: A systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To analyze facilitators and barriers affecting cancer survivors' return to work based on the views of survivors and various stakeholders, using the social ecological model.
Methods: Five electronic databases were searched in April 2025. Relevant studies and extracted data were selected by two researchers independently. Qualitative synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step process and drew on the five interrelated layers of the social ecological model.
Results: Of 5535 initial studies, 13 qualitative studies were included. Intrapersonal factors consisted of personal characteristics, disease diagnosis, post-treatment physical symptoms, post-treatment emotional states, the perceived impacts of the disease and treatments on work, understanding of and attitudes toward work, and strategies for coping with return-to-work issues. Interpersonal factors included the opinions of employers and interpersonal relations at work, as well as interpersonal support. Organizational factors consisted of occupational return-to-work arrangements and occupational support. Community factors included community support and public cognition and atmosphere. Public policy factors included the dissemination of related policies, the deficiency of related legislation, and the impacts and implementation criteria of welfare policies. The differences between cancer survivors' and stakeholders' perspectives were compared.
Conclusions: Multiple factors directly or indirectly influence cancer survivors' return-to-work decisions and experience. Cancer survivors should develop their awareness and learn more strategies in dealing with return-to-work problems. Stakeholders should care about the health status of cancer survivors, offering increased understanding and collaboration. Further studies should explore the relationships among the factors. Multi-component interventions are recommended to address return-to-work issues.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024555929.
Keywords: Cancer survivors; Return to work; Social ecological model; Systematic review.
© 2025 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40548558
-
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017. PMID: 28800057
-
Barriers to and facilitators of labor market engagement for individuals with chronic physical illnesses in their experiences with work disability policy: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2022 Feb;20(2):348-536. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00482. JBI Evid Synth. 2022. PMID: 34669686
-
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27545902 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous