Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 25:18:3159-3170.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512795. eCollection 2025.

Assessing the Causal Effect of Pulse Pressure on Migraine Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Affiliations

Assessing the Causal Effect of Pulse Pressure on Migraine Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Hongli Xu et al. J Pain Res. .

Abstract

Background: Migraine is notably prevalent among young individuals and women, who generally demonstrate favorable arterial compliance. Pulse pressure is a reliable measure of arterial compliance; nevertheless, the association between pulse pressure and migraine is not well understood.

Aim: To investigate the potential causal relationship between pulse pressure and the risk of migraine using Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: The pulse pressure studies mainly involved participants of European descent, while the migraine studies included individuals from various parts of the UK. The primary analysis used Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by weighted median and MR-Egger regression. Validation data came from the FinnGen study. Genes linked to pulse pressure were analyzed for Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG enrichment using the DAVID platform.

Results: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms linked to pulse pressure were sourced from a GWAS database (810,865 individuals), while migraine data came from UK Biobank (13,971 cases, 470,627 controls). The IVW method showed an OR of 0.992 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.987-0.997; p = 0.002]. Both weighted median (OR 0.988; 95% CI, 0.982-0.994; p < 0.001) and MR-Egger (OR 0.985; 95% CI, 0.972-0.997; p = 0.016) analyses confirmed a negative causal link between pulse pressure and migraine risk. The MR-Egger intercept analysis showed minimal evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (b = 0.00013, SE = 0.00010, p = 0.209). Finnish data confirmed a causal link between migraine and pulse pressure, with the IVW method indicating a significant association (OR = 0.790, 95% CI: 0.676-0.922; p = 0.003). KEGG enrichment analysis revealed significant pathways regulating pulse pressure, many related to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.

Conclusion: MR analysis showed that pulse pressure causally affects migraines, potentially explaining why young people and women experience more migraines, while those with type 2 diabetes have a lower risk. Further research is needed to understand this relationship.

Keywords: Mendelian randomization; causal association; gwas; migraine; pulse pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MR analysis was utilized to explore the causal impact of pulse pressure on migraine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study Design.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of Mendelian randomization analysis between pulse pressure and migraine risk in the UK Biobank dataset.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Scatter Plot, Funnel Plot, and Kernel Density Plot of MR Analysis Between Genetically Predicted Pulse Pressure and Migraine Risk in the UK Biobank dataset. (A) Scatter plot for the causal effect of pulse pressure on migraine risk. (B) Funnel plot for the overall heterogeneity in the effect of pulse pressure on migraine risk. (C) The kernel density plot for each SNP in MR analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The Sankey and Bubble plot illustrating KEGG analysis. The Sankey diagram only displays the KEGG analysis results with a significance level of P < 0.05.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mulder IA, Li M, de Vries T, et al. Anti-migraine calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists worsen cerebral ischemic outcome in mice. Ann Neurol. 2020;88(4):771–784. doi: 10.1002/ana.25831 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eigenbrodt AK, Ashina H, Khan S, et al. Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(8):501–514. doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tao X, Yan Z, Meng J, et al. The efficacy and safety of atogepant for the prophylactic treatment of migraine: evidence from randomized controlled trials. J Headache Pain. 2022;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01391-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA, Lundqvist C, et al. Symptoms of premenstrual syndrome in female migraineurs with and without menstrual migraine. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0931-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deodato M, Granato A, Martini M, et al. Neurophysiological and clinical outcomes in episodic migraine without aura: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2024;41(4):388–395. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000001055 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources