Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;75(3):192-198.
doi: 10.1007/s13224-025-02157-x. Epub 2025 May 29.

Nesting the Eggs on Another Day: Social Egg Freezing

Affiliations
Review

Nesting the Eggs on Another Day: Social Egg Freezing

Sadhana Desai et al. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

The object of this review article is to update on the freezing of oocytes for non-medical reasons. Following a review of increased success rate and safety, the cryopreservation of oocytes is no longer considered experimental. The trend of oocyte freezing is increasing amongst woman who wants to delay childbearing for personal, professional and financial reasons. Very few women return to retrieve their warmed frozen oocytes. The current evidence suggests that there is 70% chance of a live birth following cryopreservation of > 20 M II oocytes at < 38 years of age. However, a larger meta-analysis from different centres is needed to confirm the optimum age for oocyte cryopreservation, the optimum number of oocytes required for live birth, cost-effectiveness and how best to give accurate, unbiased updates to the prospective candidate wanting cryofreezing. In this paper, we have attempted to comprehensively review the literature published on the indications, success rates, factors affecting success rates, live birth rates, counselling, return rates and safety of social egg freezing.

Keywords: Oocyte cryopreservation; Planned fertility delay; Reproductive intention; Social egg freezing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestNo conflict of interest exists for any of the three authors regarding this manuscript.

Similar articles

References

    1. Marriages in England and Wales; office for national statistics, 19th May, 2022.
    1. Malchau SS, Henningsen AA, Rasmussen LS, et al. The long term prognosis for live birth in couples initiating fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1439–49. - PubMed
    1. Mertis H, Pennings G. Social egg freezing; for better, not for worse. RBM. 2011;23:824–9. - PubMed
    1. Giannopapa M, Sakellarid A, Pana A, et al. Woman electing oocyte cryopreservation: characteristics, information, sources & oocyte disposition: a systematic review. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2022;67(2):178–201. - PubMed
    1. Johnston M, Richings NM, Leung A, et al. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA. Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(3):624–35. - PubMed