Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;99(3S Suppl 1):S157-S163.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004698. Epub 2025 Jun 30.

Military-civilian partnerships on the west coast: Differing models producing combat-ready trauma teams

Affiliations

Military-civilian partnerships on the west coast: Differing models producing combat-ready trauma teams

Reynold Henry et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Military-civilian partnerships have emerged as essential platforms for preparing military trauma surgeons and health care teams for deployment. These programs, many of which were developed following congressional initiatives to enhance military trauma readiness, address the critical issue of sustaining trauma skills during peacetime avoiding a phenomenon known as the "Walker Dip," when skills and proficiency in treating battlefield injuries decline during peacetime after periods of intense conflict. They also provide military surgeons and other providers with training in research methodology and trauma systems management, skills that are difficult to obtain solely within the military structure. This article examines three distinct military-civilian partnership models based on West Coast trauma centers: Oregon Health & Science University (affiliated with the US Army), Los Angeles General Medical Center (affiliated with the US Navy), and UC Davis Medical Center (affiliated with the US Air Force). These programs provide critical trauma exposure while fostering advanced academic and leadership skills. The Joint Trauma System, with its focus on data-driven improvements in trauma care, has further shaped these programs. By comparing these models, we identify their strengths, deficits, and strategies for enhancing training effectiveness. The conclusion highlights the uniqueness of each site and affirms that there are multiple successful approaches to fostering military readiness.

Keywords: Joint Trauma System; Military-civilian partnerships; Walker Dip.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437.
    1. Jensen G, van Egmond T, Örtenwall P, Peralta R, Aboutanos MB, Galante J. Military civilian partnerships: international proposals for bridging the Walker Dip. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;89(2S Suppl 2):S4–s7.
    1. Grabo DJ, Gurney JM, Parascandola L, Knudson MM. Military-civilian partnerships and the clinical readiness mission: a preliminary study from the military health system and the American College of Surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2022;93(2S Suppl 1):S16–s21.
    1. Knudson MM, Elster EA, Bailey JA, Johannigman JA, Bailey PV, Schwab CW, et al. Military-civilian partnerships in training, sustaining, recruitment, retention, and readiness: proceedings from an exploratory first-steps meeting. J Am Coll Surg . 2018;227(2):284–292.
    1. Defense Health Agency. Joint Trauma System clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Washington, DC: Defense Health Agency; 2017 [updated 3 May 2018].

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources