Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e43021.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043021.

Evolution of research in hernia repair materials: A 20-year bibliometric and visualization study

Affiliations

Evolution of research in hernia repair materials: A 20-year bibliometric and visualization study

Miaofeng Wang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: Hernia repair is a prevalent surgical procedure globally, with increasing demand due to factors such as aging populations, obesity, and previous surgeries. The evolution of hernia repair materials and techniques has significantly impacted surgical outcomes, with advancements focusing on reducing recurrence rates and complications. This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in hernia repair materials from 2004 to 2024.

Methods: Data were collected from the Web of Science database to quantitatively assess publication trends, influential authors, journals, and collaborative networks. Bibliometric tools such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to analyze keyword co-occurrence, research hotspots, and the evolution of study themes. The analysis focused on the progression from synthetic to biological and composite meshes, alongside the development of minimally invasive techniques.

Results: The study revealed a steady increase in research output, peaking in 2020, with the United States leading in innovation. Initial research focused on synthetic meshes such as polypropylene; however, recent trends include the exploration of biological, composite, and absorbable materials. Advances in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries were also prominent, reflecting a shift toward patient-centered approaches. Emerging technologies such as nanotechnology and 3D-printed meshes were identified as promising future directions.

Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis demonstrates the evolution and diversification of hernia repair materials and techniques, emphasizing the need for continued innovation. Future research should focus on optimizing patient outcomes through advanced technologies such as tissue engineering and nanotechnology, which have the potential to overcome existing limitations and enhance clinical efficacy.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis; biological meshes; hernia repair; nanotechnology; synthetic meshes; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of articles published on hernia repair materials by year.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Global productivity maps illustrating the distribution of published articles on hernia repair materials across different countries.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
visualizes international collaboration networks in hernia repair materials research, highlighting major contributing countries such as the USA, China, and England, and illustrating their cooperative relationships through bibliometric clusters.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The heat map illustrates the global research intensity and collaboration in hernia repair materials, with the USA, China, and major European countries emerging as the primary contributors and collaborative hubs.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The visualization illustrates the co-citation network and journal prominence in hernia repair materials research, highlighting key journals and the evolution of research trends over time based on publication year.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
A co-citation network of journals in hernia repair materials research, highlighting key influential journals and their interconnectedness based on citation frequency and impact.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
A keyword-based network visualization map, identifying the most frequently cited topics in hernia repair materials.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
A network visualization map based on keyword analysis, highlighting the evolution of past and current trends in hernia repair materials.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561–71. - PubMed
    1. Ashley T, Ashley H, Wladis A, et al. Outcomes after elective inguinal hernia repair performed by associate clinicians vs medical doctors in Sierra Leone: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2032681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malik AM, Jawaid A, Talpur AH, Laghari AA, Khan A. Mesh versus non-mesh repair of ventral abdominal hernias. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008;20:54–6. - PubMed
    1. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240:578–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly S. Mesh abdominal wall hernia surgery is safe and effective-the harm New Zealand media has done. N Z Med J. 2017;130:54–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources