Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e42965.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042965.

Effect of GnRH antagonist pretreatment before controlled ovarian stimulation in antagonist protocol for infertile women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI: A propensity score matching analysis

Affiliations

Effect of GnRH antagonist pretreatment before controlled ovarian stimulation in antagonist protocol for infertile women with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI: A propensity score matching analysis

Huanying Liang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study evaluates the clinical effects of an antagonist protocol on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection among infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A propensity score matching analysis was conducted of 402 infertile women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. The patients were divided into 2 groups: GnRH antagonist (GnRH-ant) pretreatment protocol (n = 202) and non-pretreatment protocol (n = 200). The primary outcome was the high-quality embryo rate. The metaphase II (MII) oocyte rate was calculated. After adjusting for confounders, the high-quality embryo rate (48.29% vs 42.74%, P = .010) was found to be significantly higher in the pretreatment group. However, the number of retrieved oocytes (12.00 vs 12.00, P = .878), the MII oocyte rate (76.6% vs 76.0%, P = .663), the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (6.82% vs 2.27%, P > .05), and the cycle cancelation rate (51.52% vs 51.52%, P > .05) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Similar results were obtained in the propensity score matching analysis of live birth rate (LBR, 46.88% vs 40.63%, P = .476). GnRH-ant pretreatment protocol resulted in increased high-quality embryo rates without increasing the cycle cancelation rate and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The number of retrieved oocytes, the MII oocyte rate, and the clinical pregnancy outcomes did not differ after GnRH-ant pretreatment.

Keywords: PCOS; PSM; antagonist protocol; embryo quality; pretreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart. GnRH-ant = gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, non-GnRH-ant = no gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist prior to ovarian stimulation, PSM = propensity score matching.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Clinical operation process. COS = controlled ovarian stimulation, D2 = the second day of the menstrual cycle, D4 = the fourth day of the menstrual cycle, GnRH-ant = gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Embryology laboratory outcomes after PSM. (A) No significant difference in No. of oocytes retrieved between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (B) no significant difference in MⅡ oocyte rate between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (C) the high-quality embryo rate was significantly higher in the GnRH-ant group compared to the non-GnRH-ant group. GnRH-ant = gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. ns = P > .05. * P < .05.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Clinical outcome measures after PSM. (A) No significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (B) no significant difference in live birth rate between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (C) no significant difference in cumulative live birth rate between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (D) no significant difference in incidence of OHSS between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups; (E) no significant difference in cycle cancelation rate between the GnRH-ant and non-GnRH-ant groups. GnRH-ant = gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. ns = P > .05.

Similar articles

References

    1. Porter RN, Smith W, Craft IL, Abdulwahid NA, Jacobs HS. Induction of ovulation for in-vitro fertilisation using buserelin and gonadotropins. Lancet. 1984;2:1284–5. - PubMed
    1. Trenkić M, Popović J, Kopitović V, Bjelica A, Živadinović R, Pop-Trajković S. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol vs. long GnRH agonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: comparison of clinical outcome and embryo quality. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87:265–70. - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Li R, Qiao J. 2023 update on PCOS management: from diagnosis to long-term outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29:257–79.
    1. Bosch E, Broer S, Griesinger G, et al. Erratum: ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:hoaa067. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation in PCOS (2024 revision). Hum Reprod Open. 2024;2024:hoae025.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances