Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): final overall survival results from a randomised, phase 3 study
- PMID: 40587991
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00139-5
Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): final overall survival results from a randomised, phase 3 study
Abstract
Background: The phase 3 BELLINI primary endpoint was met, showing superior progression-free survival with venetoclax versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma as assessed by an independent review committee. However, venetoclax showed increased early mortality. Here, we report the final overall survival analysis.
Methods: The randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 BELLINI study enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, and one to three previous therapies, across 90 hospitals in 16 countries. Eligible patients were centrally randomly assigned (2:1, stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor exposure and number of previous lines of therapies) via interactive response technology system (block size 3) to once-daily venetoclax (800 mg orally) or placebo with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously or intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally), administered in 21-day cycles for initial eight cycles, followed by 35-day cycles until discontinuation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population; this analysis reports overall survival and investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02755597) and is completed.
Findings: From July 19, 2016, to Oct 31, 2017, 291 patients were assigned to venetoclax (n=194) or placebo (n=97); 33 patients (28 in the venetoclax group and five in the placebo group) remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. Of the 291 patients, 152 (52%) were men and 139 (48%) were women. 87 (30%) of 291 patients were Asian, 12 (4%) were Black or African American, 190 (65%) were White, and 32 (11%) were Hispanic or Latino. At 45·6 months (IQR 43·6-48·3) median follow-up, median overall survival was not reached in the venetoclax group (not reached [NR] [95% CI 44·4-not estimable]) or in the placebo group (NR [95% CI 44·0-not estimable]; HR 1·19 [95% CI 0·80-1·77]); p=0·39). Median progression-free survival was 23·4 months (95% CI 16·2-26·4) with venetoclax versus 11·4 months (95% CI 9·5-14·6) with placebo (HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·43-0·78]; p=0·00026). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (51 [26%] of 193 in the venetoclax group vs 38 [40%] of 96 in the placebo group]) and neutropenia (58 [30%] of 193 vs eight [8%] of 96 patients). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (2%) of 193 patients in the venetoclax group (two patients with pneumonia, one with death, and one with both multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and septic shock) and none in the placebo group.
Interpretation: Final overall survival analysis in the BELLINI study showed overall survival favouring placebo over venetoclax and progression-free survival favouring venetoclax over placebo, indicating venetoclax usage should be avoided in the general relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma population.
Funding: AbbVie and Genentech.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests SKK has grants or contracts from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Carsgen, GSK, Janssen, Genentech–Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Telogenomics; has served as a consultant with no personal payments for AbbVie, Amgen, ArcellX, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Carsgen, Apizyme, Glycostem, GSK, K36, Menarini, Moderna, Pfizer, Regeneron, Genentech–Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Telogenomics, Trillium, and Window Therapeutics; has served as a consultant with personal payments for Antengene, Calyx, and CVS Caremark; and has participation on an Independent Review Committee for Oncopeptides. SJH has received grants or contracts paid to institution from Janssen; has received honoraria paid to institution from AbbVie and Janssen; and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Janssen and Karyopharm. JdlR has received payment or honoraria from Amgen, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer; and has received support for attending meetings or travel from Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. RPop has received grants or contracts from GSK and Pfizer; has received consultancy fees from GSK and Roche; has received payment or honoraria from GSK, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer; has received support for attending meetings or travel from GSK and Johnson & Johnson; and has participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Johnson & Johnson, Galapagos, Sanofi, Roche, and GSK. RPop is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. CG has received payment or honoraria from GSK; has served on an advisory board and as a speaker for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Karyopharm, and Sanofi. VH has received payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi and Takeda. HS has received payment or honoraria from and participated on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb–Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Stemline; and has received support for attending meetings or travel from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb–Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi. KS has received lecture fees from Takeda, Ono Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; and has received advisory fees from special reference laboratories. MO and GK are currently employed by Genentech–Roche and may own stock in Genentech–Roche. RPot, MJ, JZ, JAR, and ED are currently employed by AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. PM has received payment or honoraria for advisory boards from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene–Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, and Sanofi. MC and IL declare no competing interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous