Pan-cancer analysis of the impact of fatty acids: a two-sample and multivariable Mendelian randomization study
- PMID: 40591044
- PMCID: PMC12214094
- DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-03010-3
Pan-cancer analysis of the impact of fatty acids: a two-sample and multivariable Mendelian randomization study
Abstract
Background: This study used Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal association between circulating fatty acids (FAs) and the incidence of 10 human cancer types.
Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with circulating FAs were selected from 500,000 UK Biobank blood samples and 114,999 plasma samples from a large GWAS. Summary-level data on 174,006 cancer patients were obtained from the FinnGen biobank. The inverse variance weighted method was used for causal estimation, with additional analyses including MR-Egger regression, weighted median, weighted mode, Cochrane Q test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analyses. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was applied to adjust for potential confounders.
Result: This study found a genetically causal effect of polyunsaturated FAs on kidney cancer incidence (OR: 1.528; 95% CI 1.164-2.266; P = 0.001), which remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment. The causal impact of omega-6, omega-3, and linoleic acid on kidney cancer risk was also observed (omega-6: OR = 1.586, P = 0.002; omega-3: OR = 1.311, P = 0.014; linoleic acid: OR = 1.527, P = 0.007). MVMR confirmed the consistent causal relationship (OR = 1.553, P = 0.0047) after adjusting for multiple variables. Results were validated in a larger cohort.
Conclusions: Higher circulating polyunsaturated FAs, especially omega-6, were associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer. Suggestive associations were found in small cell lung, rectal, bladder, pancreatic, and esophageal cancer.
Keywords: Kidney cancer; Mendelian randomization; Pan cancer analysis; Saturated fatty acid; Unsaturated fatty acid.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study only used publicly available data. No original data were collected. Ethical approval for each of the studies included in the investigation can be found in the original publications. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous