Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519020.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19020.

Video Streaming or Telephone Communication During Emergency Medical Services Dispatch Calls: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Video Streaming or Telephone Communication During Emergency Medical Services Dispatch Calls: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Martin Faurholdt Gude et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Video streaming during emergency medical calls may enhance triage precision and optimize health resource allocation. However, its clinical safety and effect on key outcomes remain unexplored in randomized clinical trials.

Objective: To assess whether video streaming during emergency calls reduces highest-urgency ambulance dispatches while ensuring safety through outcomes such as 24-hour hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions.

Design, setting, and participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted across 4 months (January 1 through April 30, 2023) at a single emergency medical dispatch center serving 1.3 million residents in the Central Denmark Region. Matched pairs of dispatchers were randomized to manage calls using either telephone only communication (control) or video streaming (intervention). Calls were routed to the next available dispatcher who had been idle the longest. Data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat approach.

Intervention: Dispatchers in the intervention group used secure, 1-way smartphone video streaming during emergency calls, while the control group followed standard telephone protocols.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of ambulances dispatched at the highest urgency level. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, ICU admission, mortality rates, and dispatch call duration.

Results: Of 18 745 calls (patient median [IQR] age, 57 [31-76] years; 54.4% female), 8124 were received by 10 dispatchers randomized to video streaming and 10 621 by 10 dispatchers randomized to telephone-only communication. Video streaming was established in 3706 of the 8124 calls (45.6% [95% CI, 44.6%-46.7%]). Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated a 5.0% absolute reduction (95% CI, 0.0%-10.1%; P = .049) in highest-urgency ambulance dispatches and no significant change (4.5% increase [95% CI, -1.1% to 10.0%; P = .11]) in nonconveyance. Hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients within 24 hours were reduced by 2.0% (95% CI, -3.7% to -0.2%; P = .03). Mean dispatch time was 3.7 minutes (95% CI, 3.4-4.0 minutes) in the video streaming group vs 3.2 minutes (95% CI, 2.9-3.4 minutes) in the telephone-only group, a difference of 0.5 minutes (95% CI, 0.1-0.9 minutes; P = .02). Mortality rates at 30 days and ICU admission rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial assessing high-stakes emergency calls, video streaming reduced the frequency of highest-urgency ambulance dispatches and lowered hospital admissions among initially nonconveyed patients, but slightly increased dispatch times. These findings suggest that video streaming may improve triage accuracy and reduce hospital and prehospital resource use.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05742412.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Blauenfeldt reported receiving personal fees from Novo Nordisk and Pfizer outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flowchart of Call Inclusion and Randomization
EMDC indicates emergency medical dispatch center. aIncluded newly hired dispatchers who were not employed for the full study period or who did not complete the mandatory 6-week training.

References

    1. Møller TP, Jensen HG, Viereck S, Lippert F, Østergaaard D. Medical dispatchers’ perception of the interaction with the caller during emergency calls — a qualitative study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00860-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torlén Wennlund K, Kurland L, Olanders K, et al. Emergency medical dispatchers’ experiences of managing emergency calls: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e059803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059803 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vuilleumier S, Fiorentino A, Dénéréaz S, Spichiger T. Identification of new demands regarding prehospital care based on 35,188 missions in 2018. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00456-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattarai HK, Bhusal S, Barone-Adesi F, Hubloue I. Prehospital emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2023;38(4):495-512. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006088 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Idland S, Iversen E, Brattebø G, Kramer-Johansen J, Hjortdahl M. From hearing to seeing: medical dispatchers’ experience with use of video streaming in medical emergency calls - a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(12):e063395. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063395 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data