Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):82.
doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00891-0.

Methodological Considerations and Effectiveness for Ecologically Valid Mental Fatigue Inducement in Sports: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Methodological Considerations and Effectiveness for Ecologically Valid Mental Fatigue Inducement in Sports: A Systematic Review

Chao Bian et al. Sports Med Open. .

Abstract

Background: Mental fatigue (MF) in sports has developed from well-controlled laboratory-based studies to applied studies with greater ecological validity. Ongoing developments in the representativeness of MF inducement approaches, including the broad range of sport-specific motor tasks to simulated real-life scenarios, have shown methodological variability and inconsistent outcomes of effectiveness. Evaluating and comparing these approaches is essential to provide recommendations for designing inducement tasks in future research and considerations for practitioners. Therefore, the systematic review aimed to summarize more ecologically valid MF-inducing tasks in representative sports contexts and to evaluate the MF inducement effectiveness via manipulation check outcomes and potential after effects on subsequent sport-specific performance.

Methods: The review was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42024577183). PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus were searched until 21 August 2024 for studies that applied acute, more ecologically valid MF-inducing tasks within sports-specific contexts. The MF inducement task design and effectiveness across representative sports and participants were investigated.

Results: Twelve papers were included. Only a quarter of studies presented an overall low risk of bias. The 20-minute sports-specific motor tasks with cognitive demands and most 30-minute simulated real-life scenarios (i.e., social media use on smartphones, watching tactical videos, sports-themed videogame play) successfully induced MF in differing athlete samples. Ineffective MF inducement was attributed to shorter task duration, passive engagement with sparse cognitive demands, or the involvement of less susceptible participants.

Conclusions: This systematic review evaluated MF inducement methodologies with greater ecological validity to sporting contexts. The inducement effectiveness varied within four task types. Athletes and sports practitioners should carefully manage the modality and content of pre-competition activities to minimize MF. Future research should refine and co-design the MF-inducing task with practitioners based on multifaceted MF evidence from laboratory and real-life settings, create immersive scenarios that can better replicate the inducement process in specific contexts, and improve measurement tools, which will provide comprehensive evaluation and verification of the MF inducement.

Keywords: Cognitive fatigue; Ecological validity; Inducement; Mental fatigue; Methodology; Real-life scenario; Representative; Sports context.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate: Chao Bian, Suzanna Russell, Ana Mali, Elke Lathouwers, Kevin De Pauw, Jelle Habay, Špela Bogataj, and Bart Roelands declare that the systematic review complies with all ethical standards. No participants were recruiIted for the present study, so no consent for participation needed to be collected. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Competing Interests: Chao Bian, Suzanna Russell, Ana Mali, Elke Lathouwers, Kevin De Pauw, Jelle Habay, Špela Bogataj, and Bart Roelands have no competing interests relevant to the content of this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias within the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of bias across studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Considerations and practical suggestions

Similar articles

References

    1. Boksem M, Tops M. Mental fatigue: costs and benefits. Brain Res Rev. 2008;59:125–39. - PubMed
    1. Signorini G, Scurati R, Bosio A, Maestri G, Rigon M, Trecroci A et al. Effects of cognitive load and different exercise intensities on perceived effort in sedentary university students: a follow up of the Cubo fitness test validation. Front Psychol. 2023;14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borragán G, Slama H, Bartolomei M, Peigneux P. Cognitive fatigue: A Time-based Resource-sharing account. Cortex. 2017;89. - PubMed
    1. Lopes T, Fortes L, Smith M, Roelands B, Marcora S. Mental fatigue and sport: from the lab to the field. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1213019. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roelands B, Kelly V, Russell S, Habay J. The physiological nature of mental fatigue: current knowledge and future avenues for sport science. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021;17:1–2. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources