Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;12(1):1103.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05365-2.

Cross-cultural data on romantic love and mate preferences from 117,293 participants across 175 countries

Marta Kowal  1 Piotr Sorokowski  2 Biljana Gjoneska  3 Katarzyna Pisanski  2   4   5 Gerit Pfuhl  6 Leonardo Aguilar  7 Steve M J Janssen  8 Benjamin Gelbart  9 Patrícia Arriaga  10 Jan Antfolk  11 Katarina Zvončáková  12   13 Linda H Lidborg  14 Jorge Contreras-Garduño  15 Mikhail V Kozlov  16 Taciano L Milfont  17 Marco A C Varella  18 Valerija Križanić  19 Mahmoud Boussena  20 Tina Kavčič  21   22 Diana Ribeiro da Silva  23 Brahim Hamdaoui  24 Fatima Zahra Sahli  25 Karlijn Massar  26 Eliane Deschrijver  27 Tatsunori Ishii  28 Hakan Cetinkaya  29 Oksana Senyk  30 Farida Guemaz  31 Koen Ponnet  32 Yahya Don  33 Dušana Šakan  34 Gyesook Yoo  35 Ravit Nussinson  36   37 Joaquín Ungaretti  38 Ali R Can  39 Izzet Duyar  40 Jiří Čeněk  41   42 Joao Carneiro  43 Norbert Meskó  44 Luca Kozma  45 Ellen K Nyhus  46 Mona Vintila  47 Oulmann Zerhouni  48   49 Farid Pazhoohi  50 Maja Zupančič  21 Sinem Söylemez  51 Austin H-E Wang  52 Marietta Papadatou-Pastou  53 Irena Pavela Banai  19 Pavol Prokop  54   55 Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee  56 Reza Afhami  57 Jean C Natividade  58 Roberto Baiocco  59 Mara Morelli  60 Toivo Aavik  61 Ezgi Toplu-Demirtaş  62 Singha Tulyakul  63 Anna Wlodarczyk  64 Razieh Chegeni  65 Anabela C Santos  66 Dmitry Grigoryev  67 Dmitrii Dubrov  67 Dimitri Chubinidze  68 Gözde Ikizer  69 Nana Burduli  70 Johanna Czamanski-Cohen  71 Rizwana Amin  72   73 Petros Roussos  74 Evgeniya Hristova  75 Rūta Sargautytė  76 Ekaterine Pirtskhalava  77 Tenuunjargal Avirmed  78 Arooj Najmussaqib  79 Abdelilah Charyate  80 Shagufta Batool  81 Tatiana Volkodav  82 Yoshihiko Kunisato  83 Yuki Yamada  84 Asako Toyama  85 Mariia Perun  86 Seda Dural  87 Tetyana Mandzyk  86 Anna Studzinska  88 Ognen Spasovski  89 Felipe E García  90 Caterina Grano  91 Merve Boğa  92 Mehmet Koyuncu  93 Sangeeta Singh  94 Ju Hee Park  95 Derya Atamtürk  40 Samuel Lins  43 Martin Pírko  96 David Lacko  12   42 Balazs Aczel  97 Ferenc Kocsor  44 Ádám Putz  98 Tobias Otterbring  99 Pavol Kačmár  100 Efisio Manunta  101   102 Théo Besson  103 Nasim Ghahraman Moharrampour  104 Çağlar Solak  51 Bojana M Dinić  105 Ignacio Estevan  106 Merve Topcu Bulut  107 Nicolas Kervyn  108 Moises Mebarak  109 Jackson G Lu  110 Nejc Plohl  111 Bojan Musil  111 Adil Samekin  112 Kirill G Miroshnik  113   114 Clément Cornec  5 Isabella Giammusso  115 Ulf-Dietrich Reips  116 Maria Rosa Miccoli  116 Miriam Parise  117 Sabrina Stöckli  118   119 Tiago Marot  120 Sibele D Aquino  58 Amanda Londero-Santos  121 Antonio Chirumbolo  122 Aybegum Memisoglu-Sanli  123 Jaroslava V Valentova  124 Cemre Karaarslan  125 Ivana Hromatko  126 Kevin Sevag Kertechian  127 Ogeday Çoker  128 Matheus F Ribeiro  129 Carlota Batres  130 Ilker Dalgar  123 Stephanie J Eder  131 Katarina Mišetić  132 Marios Argyrides  133 Vita Mikuličiūtė  76 Silvia Mari  134 Elisabeth Oberzaucher  135   136   137 Kathrin Masuch  135   137 Alan D A Mattiassi  138 Salma S Omar  139 Elena Piccinelli  140 Eda Ermagan Caglar  141 Diogo Lamela  142 David A Frederick  143 Aleksander Kobylarek  144 Ma Criselda T Pacquing  145   146 Marc Eric S Reyes  145   146 Marcos Zumárraga-Espinosa  147 Feten Fekih-Romdhane  148   149 Talía Gómez Yepes  150   151 Edgardo Etchezahar  150   152 Katarzyna Galasinska  153 Jan P Röer  154 Ayşegül Şahin  40 Miguel Landa-Blanco  155 Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe  156 Arkadiusz Urbanek  144 Chee-Seng Tan  157 Rita Castro  43 Ksenija Cunichina  76 Anna Krasnodębska  158 Daniel Conroy-Beam  9 Franciszek Ostaszewski  153 Izabela Chałatkiewicz  153 Beatriz Abad-Villaverde  159 Bastien Trémolière  160 Alexios Arvanitis  161 Gulmira T Topanova  162 William J Chopik  163 Grace Akello  164 Ariela F Pagani  165 Silvia Donato  117 Peter Fedor  54 Tomasz Frackowiak  2 Simon Ozer  166 Marlon Mayorga-Lascano  167 Farah Khan  168 Maryanne L Fisher  169 Princess Lovella G Maturan  170 Tatiana Semenovskikh  171 Sanjana Dutt  172 William Tamayo-Agudelo  173 Gulnara Ismukhanova  174 Laith Al-Shawaf  175   176   177   178 Luisa Angelucci  179   180 Adam Bode  181 Sercan Balım  182 Jovi C Dacanay  183 Chiemezie S Atama  184 Kai A D Morgan Campbell  185 Tchilissila A Simões  186 Barış Özener  40 Paula Błauciak  187 Filipe Prazeres  188
Affiliations

Cross-cultural data on romantic love and mate preferences from 117,293 participants across 175 countries

Marta Kowal et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

Psychological studies on close relationships have often overlooked cultural diversity, dynamic processes, and potentially universal principles that shape intimate partnerships. To address the limited generalizability of previous research and advance our understanding of romantic love experiences, mate preferences, and physical attractiveness, we conducted a large-scale cross-cultural survey study on these topics. A total of 404 researchers collected data in 45 languages from April to August 2021, involving 117,293 participants from 175 countries. Aside from standard demographic questions, the survey included valuable information on variables relevant to romantic relationships: intimate, passionate, and committed love within romantic relationships, physical-attractiveness enhancing behaviors, gender equality endorsement, collectivistic attitudes, personal history of pathogenic diseases, relationship quality, jealousy, personal involvement in sexual and/or emotional infidelity, relational mobility, mate preferences, and acceptance of sugar relationships. The resulting dataset provides a rich resource for investigating patterns within, and associations across, a broad range of variables relevant to romantic relationships, with extensive opportunities to analyze individual experiences worldwide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A schematic overview of the study flow.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A visual overview of the study’s content (for detailed list of all variables, see Codebook).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A world map visualizing the number of participants across countries, with the color scale representing the sample size (the darker, the larger). Note. Gray areas represent countries not covered by the data.

References

    1. Arnett, J. J. The Neglected 95%: Why American Psychology Needs to Become Less American. In Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research 4th edn (ed. Kazdin, A. E.) Ch.8, 10.1037/14805-008 (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2016).
    1. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature466, 29–29, 10.1038/466029a (2010). - PubMed
    1. Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C. & Arnett, J. J. The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist76, 116–129, 10.1037/amp0000622 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Klein, V., Savaş, Ö. & Conley, T. D. How WEIRD and androcentric is sex research? Global inequities in study populations. The Journal of Sex Research59, 810–817, 10.1080/00224499.2021.1918050 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Bode, A. & Kowal, M. Toward consistent reporting of sample characteristics in studies investigating the biological mechanisms of romantic love. Frontiers in Psychology14, 983419, 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.983419 (2023). - PMC - PubMed