A mixed-methods study on negative psychological states of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment
- PMID: 40594301
- PMCID: PMC12217706
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-06397-9
A mixed-methods study on negative psychological states of infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment
Abstract
The incidence of infertility in the world is gradually increasing, and assisted reproductive treatment is one of the main methods for infertility treatment worldwide. Infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment are likely to have a negative psychological state. However, deficits in the existing knowledge about women's negative psychological conditions greatly limit the implementation and effectiveness of psychological interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the specific risk factors for a negative psychological state in infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. A mixed-methods design that combined quantitative survey and qualitative interview was adopted in this study. In the quantitative study, the DASS-21 questionnaire was administered on 437 infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment to evaluate the prevalence of negative psychological symptoms. Descriptive statistics were conducted on the participants' demographic information and clinical data, and multiple linear regression analysis was performed on the quantitative data to determine the risk factors for negative psychological states. In the qualitative study, semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 women who reported negative psychological symptoms in the quantitative survey. Thematic analysis was employed for qualitative data. The results of quantitative and qualitative study were comprehensively analyzed and classified. The results of the quantitative survey suggested a high prevalence of anxiety (24.3%), depression (10.8%) and stress (8.7%). Univariate analysis revealed that a negative psychological state in infertile women is significantly related to occupation type, household income, infertility factors, duration of infertility treatment, and the number of previous assisted reproductive treatment cycles (P < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that annual per capita household income was the primary factor influencing depression scores (P < 0.05), the duration of infertility treatment and occupation type were the primary factors influencing anxiety scores (P < 0.05), unexplained infertility was the primary factor influencing stress scores (P < 0.05). Subsequent qualitative research provided a more detailed exploration of the characteristics and sources of negative psychological states of infertile women, which yielded five key themes: characteristics of a negative psychological state, medical aspects, family issues, conflicts with normal life, and social context influences. The prevalence of a negative psychological state is high among infertile Chinese women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. The results of mixed-methods study reveal that medical factors associated with assisted reproductive treatment, insufficient family emotional support, conflicts between work and treatment, and financial burdens are the main causes of negative psychological states. Future research needs to explore more effective psychological intervention methods to improve the psychological state of infertile women.
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Infertile women; Mixed-methods design; Negative psychological state; Stress.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College (No. KY2024014, Hangzhou, China). The ethical standards adhered to by this research are in accordance with the 2013 version of the Helsinki Declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment in this mixed methods study.
Similar articles
-
Psychological and educational interventions for subfertile men and women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011034.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27031818 Free PMC article.
-
Antioxidants for male subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 4;5(5):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35506389 Free PMC article.
-
Baseline anatomical assessment of the uterus and ovaries in infertile women: a systematic review of the evidence on which assessment methods are the safest and most effective in terms of improving fertility outcomes.Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Sep 1;23(5):533-547. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx019. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28903473
-
Gender differences in psychological status of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):2131. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23314-x. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40483394 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 07;(12):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub3. PMID: 14974014 Updated.
References
-
- Infertility Prevalence Estimates, 1990–2021. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/978920068315 (Accessed 29 May 2023).
-
- Zou, K., Ding, G. & Huang, H. Advances in research into gamete and embryo-fetal origins of adult diseases. Sci. China Life Sci.62, 360–368 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Bai, F. et al. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in Mainland China: 2016. Hum. Reprod. (Oxford, England)35, 446–452 (2020). - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical