Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20821.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05893-2.

The effect of pre-transplant dialysis duration on the relationship between delayed graft function and recipient death

Affiliations

The effect of pre-transplant dialysis duration on the relationship between delayed graft function and recipient death

Rui-Yu Wang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delayed graft function (DGF) on recipient death after kidney transplant from donors after brain death (DBD) stratified by pre-transplant dialysis duration. Using a retrospective database, this study collected clinical data from 1,311 patients who underwent DBD kidney transplantation. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the DGF and recipient death. We applied a competing risk analysis model to explore the risk factors associated with DGF. The interaction between DGF and pre-transplant dialysis duration on recipient death was then further determined and analysed in subgroups. In addition, an individualised prediction model for recipient death was developed in the group with an extended pre-transplant dialysis duration. Overall, 53 patients (4.0%) died after kidney transplantation. DGF was independently associated with recipient death (HR: 2.672, 95% CI: 1.441-4.954, P = 0.002). A significant interaction was found between DGF and pre-transplant dialysis duration on recipient death (P = 0.037). In the extended pre-transplant dialysis duration (> 24.7 months), recipient age (HR: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.019-1.102, P = 0.004), donor age (HR: 1.050, 95% CI: 1.005-1.096, P = 0.027), and DGF level (HR: 4.311, 95% CI: 2.003-9.279, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for recipient death. Furthermore, in the group of patients with extended pre-transplant dialysis duration, a predictive model based on DGF, recipient age, and donor age showed good predictive accuracy, calibration, and clinical utility. DGF was associated with recipient death within 3 years after DBD kidney transplantation only in patients with an extended pre-transplant dialysis duration, suggesting that pre-transplant dialysis duration is associated with whether DGF is an independent risk factor for recipient death.

Keywords: DGF; Kidney transplant; Pre-transplant dialysis duration; Prediction model; Recipient death.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that this study was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow chart of patient selection. DBD, donation after brain death; DGF, delayed graft function.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of all patients and DGF-stratified patients after DBD kidney transplantation. DGF, delayed graft function; DBD, donation after brain death. (A) Overall survival probability of all recipients (n = 1311); (B) Stratified analysis by DGF status: DGF = 0 (event-free, n = 1162) vs. DGF = 1 (event occurred, n = 149).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A prognostic nomogram for predicting the recipient death for the 6, 12 and 36 months. DGF, delayed graft function.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The AUC at 6 (A), 12 (B), and 36 months (C) for the nomogram in the training set, and the AUC at 6 (D), 12 (E), and 36 months (F) for the nomogram in the validation set. AUC, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The calibration curves at 6 (A), 12 (B), and 36 months (C) for the nomogram in the training set, and the calibration curves at 6 (D), 12 (E), and 36 months (F) for the nomogram in the validation set.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The DCA at 6 (A), 12 (B), and 36 months (C) for the nomogram in the training set, and the DCA at 6 (D), 12 (E), and 36 months (F) for the nomogram in the validation set. DCA, decision curve analysis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schnuelle, P. et al. Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with Hemodialysis during long-term follow-up. J. Am. Soc. Nephrology: JASN. 9, 2135–2141 (1998). - PubMed
    1. Wyld, M. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLoS Med.9, e1001307 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Israni, A. K. et al. OPTN/SRTR 2022 annual data report: deceased organ donation. Am. J. Transplantation: Official J. Am. Soc. Transplantation Am. Soc. Transpl. Surg.24, S457–s488 (2024). - PubMed
    1. Ying, T. et al. Death after kidney transplantation: an analysis by era and time Post-Transplant. J. Am. Soc. Nephrology: JASN. 31, 2887–2899 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinto-Ramirez, J. et al. Risk factors for graft loss and death among kidney transplant recipients: A competing risk analysis. PloS One. 17, e0269990 (2022). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources