Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21305.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04869-6.

Deep learning based classification of tibio-femoral knee osteoarthritis from lateral view knee joint X-ray images

Affiliations

Deep learning based classification of tibio-femoral knee osteoarthritis from lateral view knee joint X-ray images

S Sheik Abdullah et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Design an effective deep learning-driven method to locate and classify the tibio-femoral knee joint space width (JSW) with respect to both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views. Compare the results and see how successfully a deep learning approach can locate and classify tibio-femoral knee joint osteoarthritis from both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral-view knee joint x-ray images. To evaluate the performance of a deep learning approach to classify and compare radiographic tibio-femoral knee joint osteoarthritis from both AP and lateral view knee joint digital X-ray images. We use 4334 data points (knee X-ray images) for this study. This paper introduces a methodology to locate, classify, and compare the outcomes of tibio-femoral knee joint osteoarthritis from both AP and lateral knee joint x-ray images. We have fine-tuned DenseNet 201 with transfer learning to extract the features to detect and classify tibio-femoral knee joint osteoarthritis from both AP view and lateral view knee joint X-ray images. The proposed model is compared with some classifiers. The proposed model locate the tibio femoral knee JSW localization accuracy at 98.12% (lateral view) and 99.32% (AP view). The classification accuracy with respect to the lateral view is 92.42% and the AP view is 98.57%, which indicates the performance of automatic detection and classification of tibio-femoral knee joint osteoarthritis with respect to both views (AP and lateral views).We represent the first automated deep learning approach to classify tibio-femoral osteoarthritis on both the AP view and the lateral view, respectively. The proposed deep learning approach trained on the femur and tibial bone regions from both AP view and lateral view digital X-ray images. The proposed model performs better at locating and classifying tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis than the existing approaches. The proposed approach will be helpful for the clinicians/medical experts to analyze the progression of tibio-femoral knee OA in different views. The proposed approach performs better in AP view than Lateral view. So, when compared to other continuing existing architectures/models, the proposed model offers exceptional outcomes with fine-tuning.

Keywords: AP view; DenseNet 201; Digital X-ray images; Lateral view; Tibio-femoral osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Consent to participate: A waiver for informed consent of the patients was provided by the Code of Ethics committee (CEC) constituted by the Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education due to the retrospective and observational nature of our study. Ethical approval: The experimental protocol for the study was approved by the Code of Ethics Committee (CEC) of Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education (Reference: KARE/CEC/MoM/2024–2025/01 dated 20.07.2024). All procedures performed in this studies involving human participants adhered to the ethical standards of the institution and were conducted in compliance with the principles outlined in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. This ensures that the research upholds the highest ethical standards, safeguarding the rights, dignity, and well-being of all participants involved. Informed consent: The Code of Ethics Committee (CEC) of Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education has made the decision to waive the need for informed consent for a proposed research study involving the use of a dataset of knee X-ray images (Reference: KARE/CEC/MoM/2024–2025/01 dated 20.07.2024). This decision is based on the fact that the study uses anonymized images of subjects, not directly involving interactions with or identifying details of patients. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
AP view and lateral view of the knee joint with ROI.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of the proposed approach.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Fine-tuned DenseNet 201 architecture—Tibio femoral knee OA detection and classification—AP view. (b) Fine-tuned DenseNet 201 architecture—Tibio femoral knee OA detection and classification—Lateral view.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) a–d Examples of tibio femoral JSW bone detection in the digital knee joint X-ray images (AP view). (b) a–d Examples of tibio femoral JSW bone detection in the digital knee joint X-ray images (Lateral view).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(a) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio-knee joint OA classification—AP view-DenseNet-201). (b) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio- knee joint OA classification—Lateral view-DenseNet 201). (c) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio- knee joint OA classification—AP view-ResNet 50). (d) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio-knee joint OA classification—Lateral view-ResNet 50). (e) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio-knee joint OA classification—AP view-Inceptionv3). (f) Accuracy and loss curve of the proposed approach (tibio-knee joint OA classification—Lateral view-Inceptionv3).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
(a) (a–f) Examples of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—AP view. (b) (a–f) Examples of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—Lateral view.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
(a) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—AP view (DenseNet 201). (b) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—Lateral view (DenseNet 201). (c) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—AP view (ResNet 50). (d) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—Lateral view (ResNet 50). (e) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—AP view (Inception v3). (f) Confusion matrix of tibio femoral knee joint osteoarthritis classification—Lateral view (inception v3).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Performance comparison with existing approaches.

Similar articles

References

    1. Conaghan, P. G. et al. Impact and therapy of osteoarthritis: the arthritis care OA Nation 2012 survey. Clin. Rheumatol.10.1007/s10067-014-2692-1 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Kellgren, J. H. and J S Lawrence:Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis.10.1136/ard.16.4.494 (1957). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin, J., Li, R., Kang, X. & Li, H. Risk factors for radiographic tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis: the Wuchuan osteoarthritis study. Int. J. Rheumatol.10.1155/2010/385826 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demehri, S., Hafezi-Nejad, N. & Carrino, J. A. Conventional and novel imaging modalities in osteoarthritis: current state of the evidence. J. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.10.1097/BOR.0000000000000163 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Cibere, J. Do we need radiographs to diagnose osteoarthritis? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol.10.1016/j.berh.2005.08.001 (2006). - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources