Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20637.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06562-0.

In vivo study of intraoral scanner trueness in partial edentulism

Affiliations

In vivo study of intraoral scanner trueness in partial edentulism

Mengxin Yao et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trueness of complete-arch intraoral scanning of maxillary partially edentulous patients. Sixty-four patients with partially edentulous upper jaws were recruited. The intraoral digital impressions were obtained by Trios 3 scanner. Conventional impression procedure was performed with polyether silicone rubber as reference models. The trueness of intraoral digital impressions for dentition, edentulous area, and palate was calculated by aligning digital scanning data to conventional impression data using Geomagic Studio 2013. Data were classified according to arch width, palatal vault height, Kennedy classification, as well as number and distribution of missing teeth. There were significant differences among the average absolute deviations of dentition (61.9 ± 36.8 μm), palate (115.9 ± 44.3 μm), and edentulous area (63.0 ± 37.1 μm) (P < 0.001). There was no significant effect of arch width, Kennedy Classification, or number and distribution of missing teeth on the trueness of digital impressions (P > 0.05), while the intraoral scanning trueness of edentulous area tended to decrease in patients with higher palatal vault (P = 0.003). Thus, it is feasible to use intraoral scanner to obtain the digital impressions for the fabrication of RPDs. The trueness of patients with higher palatal vault needs more attention and verification.

Keywords: Best-fit alignment; Edentulous area; Intraoral scanning; Palate; Removable partial dentures; Trueness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scanning sequence of intraoral scanner.
Fig.3
Fig.3
Trueness of intraoral digital impression of dentition, palate, edentulous area, and entire maxilla. The black dots represent outliers, and “ + ” denotes the mean value. ***P < 0.001.
Fig.4
Fig.4
Color-coded maps of whole maxilla.

Similar articles

References

    1. Zimmermann, M., Mehl, A., Mörmann, W. H. & Reich, S. Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview. Int. J. Comput. Dent.18, 101–129 (2015). - PubMed
    1. Richert, R. et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: A review to make a successful impression. J. Healthc. Eng.2017, 8427595 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burzynski, J. A., Firestone, A. R., Beck, F. M. Jr., Fields, H. W. & Deguchi, T. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial. Orthop.153, 534–541 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Mangano, A., Beretta, M., Luongo, G., Mangano, C. & Mangano, F. Conventional Vs digital impressions: acceptability, treatment comfort and stress among young orthodontic patients. Open Dent. J.31, 118–124 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rödiger, M., Heinitz, A., Bürgers, R. & Rinke, S. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study. Clin. Oral Investig.21, 579–587 (2017). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources