Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23036.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07264-3.

Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods

Affiliations

Park use patterns and park satisfaction before and after citywide park renovations in low-income New York City neighborhoods

Rachel L Thompson et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Urban parks may promote health through physical activity, stress management, and social connectedness. However, poor-quality parks in disrepair are underutilized, limiting these benefits. This study evaluated the impact of a citywide park renovation program known as the Community Parks Initiative (CPI) on changes in park use patterns and park satisfaction among residents living in low-income New York City neighborhoods. Repeated cross-sectional surveys were administered to residents living near 31 parks undergoing CPI renovations (545 pre-renovation and 201 post-renovation respondents) and near 21 parks in socio-demographically matched control neighborhoods (345 pre-renovation and 129 post-renovation respondents). Surveys measured self-reported past-month park visits, typical park visit duration, and satisfaction with park quality and facilities. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach, generalized estimating equations were fit to compare changes over time in park use and satisfaction among residents living near parks receiving renovations compared to those living near control parks. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, income, public housing, marital status, and children in household. Residents in neighborhoods receiving park renovations reported a larger increase in minutes spent at the park on weekdays [DID = 30.0 min (95% CI 10.3, 49.7)] and total minutes spent at the park in the last 30 days [DID = 466.3 min (95% CI 63.0, 869.6)] compared to controls. Residents of renovated park neighborhoods also reported larger increases in park satisfaction relative to residents of control neighborhoods, with the largest improvements in the percent of residents satisfied with overall park quality [DID = 38.4% (95% CI 25.2, 51.6)] and maintenance of grounds and facilities [DID = 40.9% (95% CI 27.7, 54.1)]. This study provides evidence that park renovations are an important urban planning strategy to support community health through increased park use and improved park perceptions.

Keywords: Built environment; Natural experiment; Park renovation; Park satisfaction; Park use; Urban health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study involved the use of human subjects. All procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and were approved by the appropriate institutional committees (City University of New York Institutional Review Board approval #2016-0248). The privacy rights of human subjects were observed and written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation in research activities.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean park use measures among adult residents living near study parks before and after CPI park renovations. Means by intervention group (green square = intervention, grey circle = control) and 95% confidence intervals (vertical bars) were estimated using linear GEE models that included variables for time (pre-renovation vs. post-renovation), intervention group (renovated vs. control parks), and an interaction between time and intervention group (the DID estimator), and additionally adjusted for age group, BMI category, annual household income, public housing, marital status, and children in household. An asterisk denotes a significant (p < 0.05) DID estimator. BMI body mass index, CPI community parks initiative, DID difference-in-differences, GEE generalized estimating equations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean park satisfaction measures among adult residents living near study parks before and after CPI park renovations. Means by intervention group (green square = intervention, grey circle = control) and 95% confidence intervals (vertical bars) were estimated using linear GEE models that included variables for time (pre-renovation vs. post-renovation), intervention group (renovated vs. control parks), and an interaction between time and intervention group (the DID estimator), and additionally adjusted for age group, BMI category, annual household income, public housing, marital status, and children in household. An asterisk denotes a significant (p < 0.05) DID estimator. BMI body mass index, CPI community parks initiative, DID difference-in-differences, GEE generalized estimating equations.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ritchie, H., Samborska, V. & Roser, M. Urbanization. Our World in Datahttps://ourworldindata.org/urbanization (2024).
    1. World Health Organization. Urban health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/urban-health (2021).
    1. Ventriglio, A., Torales, J., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., Berardis, D. D. & Bhugra, D. Urbanization and emerging mental health issues. CNS Spectr.26, 43–50 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Escobedo, F. J., Kroeger, T. & Wagner, J. E. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ. Pollut.159, 2078–2087 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E. & Stevens, J. C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For. Urban Green.4, 115–123 (2006).

LinkOut - more resources