Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22158.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06396-w.

Effects of concentric and concentric-eccentric resistance training on speed and force in adult soccer players

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of concentric and concentric-eccentric resistance training on speed and force in adult soccer players

Dominik Bokůvka et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of concentric and concentric-eccentric strength training on speed and strength performance in sub-elite soccer players. Thirty-four healthy Czech soccer players were randomly assigned to a concentric group (CONG, n = 13), concentric/eccentric group (ECCG, n = 12), or control group (CG, n = 9). All participants completed the study. Over an 8-week intervention period, the CONG and ECCG groups accomplished 16 training sessions focused on leg curl and leg extension exercises. Speed and strength assessments were performed at baseline and post-intervention. While no significant improvements were observed in speed performance (p > 0.05), both intervention groups demonstrated significant gains in strength parameters. One-repetition maximum (1RM) knee extension increased by 17.5% (CONG, p < 0.001) and 18.3% (ECCG, p < 0.001), and the 1RM knee flexion improved by 10.5% (CONG, p < 0.001) and 12.2% (ECCG, p < 0.001, compared to the CG, with moderate and clear effect sizes. ANOVA analysis revealed significant interaction effects for knee extension 1RM (p < 0.001), knee flexion 1RM (p = 0.022), and isometric knee extension of the dominant leg (p = 0.033). Despite these gains in muscle strength, speed performance showed only minor, non-significant changes, with the CONG group experiencing a 2.8% improvement in the 10-meter sprint. In conclusion, both concentric and concentric-eccentric strength training protocols effectively enhanced lower-limb strength in soccer players, with the concentric-eccentric approach showing slightly better results. However, neither training method significantly improved speed. Coaches should use concentric-eccentric exercises to enhance strength but consider other methods to boost speed and overall performance.

Keywords: Athletic performance; Eccentric training; Force production; Muscle strength; Physical conditioning; Soccer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Speed tests design. (a) linear 30-m test with a 10-m split time; (b) 30-meter change-of-direction test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of changes in performance among CONG, ECCG and CG. (A) Sprint tests; (B) Strength test – 1RM and isometric knee extension (angle of 90); (C) Isometric knee extension and flexion, angular velocities of 60°/s (D) Isometric knee extension and flexion, angular velocities of 240°/s. CONG = Concentric Group; ECCG = Concentric/Eccentric Group; CG = control group; S10m = Sprint 10-meter; S10m_B = Spint 10-meters with ball; S30m = Sprint 30-meter; S30m_B = Sprint 30-meter with ball; CODS = Change of Direction Sprint; CODS_B = Change of Direction Sprint with ball; Ex_1RM = Knee Extension One-Maximal Repetition; Flex_1RM = Knee Flexion One-Maximal Repetition; Iso_Ex_DOM = Isometric knee Extension Dominant leg; Iso_Ex_NDOM = Isometric knee Extension non-dominant leg; Ex_DOM_60: Isometric knee Extension with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_DOM_60: Isometric knee Flexion with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Ex_NDOM_60: Isometric knee Extension with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_NDOM_60: Isometric knee Flexion with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_DOM_240: Isometric knee Flexion with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s; Ex_NDOM_240: Isometric knee Extension with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s; Flex_NDOM_240: Isometric knee Flexion with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effet Size graph of CONG, ECCG and CG on (A) Sprint tests; (B) Strength test – 1RM and isometric knee extension (angle of 90); (C) Isometric knee extension and flexion, angular velocities of 60°/s (D) Isometric knee extension and flexion, angular velocities of 240°/s. CONG = Concentric Group; ECCG = Concentric/Eccentric Group; CG = control group; S10m = Sprint 10-meter; S10m_B = Spint 10-meters with ball; S30m = Sprint 30-meter; S30m_B = Sprint 30-meter with ball; CODS = Change of Direction Sprint; CODS_B = Change of Direction Sprint with ball; Ex_1RM = Knee Extension One-Maximal Repetition; Flex_1RM = Knee Flexion One-Maximal Repetition; Iso_Ex_DOM = Isometric knee Extension Dominant leg; Iso_Ex_NDOM = Isometric knee Extension non-dominant leg; Ex_DOM_60: Isometric knee Extension with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_DOM_60: Isometric knee Flexion with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Ex_NDOM_60: Isometric knee Extension with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_NDOM_60: Isometric knee Flexion with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 60°/s; Flex_DOM_240: Isometric knee Flexion with Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s; Ex_NDOM_240: Isometric knee Extension with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s; Flex_NDOM_240: Isometric knee Flexion with Non Dominant leg, in anglular velocities of 240°/s.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cavanagh, B. Peer review. Specificity of power training for sports performance: A review of the literature. J. Aust Strength. Cond. 4, 25–29 (2010).
    1. Newton, R. U. & Kraemer, W. J. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed methods training strategy. Strength Cond. J. 16, 20–31 (1994)
    1. Tricoli, V., Lamas, L., Carnevale, R. & Ugrinowitsch, C. Short-term effects on lower-body functional power development: weightlifting vs. vertical jump training programs. J. Strength. Cond Res.19, 433–437 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Farthing, J. & Chilibeck, P. The effects of eccentric and concentric training at different velocities on muscle hypertrophy. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.89, 578–586 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Fernandez-Gonzalo, R., Lundberg, T., Alvarez-Alvarez, L. & de Paz, J. Muscle damage responses and adaptations to eccentric-overload resistance exercise in men and women. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.114, 1075–1084 (2014). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources