Breast cancer determinants in low- to upper-middle-income countries: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and an urgent call for implementation science
- PMID: 40597060
- PMCID: PMC12211264
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-14499-w
Breast cancer determinants in low- to upper-middle-income countries: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies and an urgent call for implementation science
Abstract
Introduction: Meta-analyses on breast cancer determinants in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), often produce fragmented, context-specific findings. This umbrella review provides a consolidated synthesis to identify consistent risk factors and strengthen the evidence base for guiding targeted public health strategies.
Methods and materials: In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic search for meta-analyses across multiple databases. Study quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) tool. Data were analyzed using STATA version 14, applying a random-effects model to estimate pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. Forest plots were used to visualize determinants. Publication bias was assessed through funnel plots and Egger's test, while heterogeneity was evaluated using the I-squared (I²) statistic and Galbraith plots. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess small-study effects.
Results: Out of 1,515 publications reviewed, 35 met the inclusion criteria. Eight determinants of breast cancer showed convincing evidence under the random-effects model: being overweight (POR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.23), oral contraceptive use (POR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11-1.27), family history of breast cancer (POR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.84-2.67), age ≥ 40 years (POR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.60-2.05), smoking history (POR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11-1.34), exposure to air pollution (POR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), higher fruit and vegetable consumption (POR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.92), and history of night work (POR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.25).
Conclusions: This umbrella review identified eight key breast cancer risk factors. Non-modifiable factors like age ≥ 40 and family history, along with modifiable factors such as overweight, smoking, oral contraceptive use, air pollution, and night shift work, increased the odds of breast cancer. Adequate fruit and vegetable intake was linked to reduced odds, suggesting a protective effect. We recommend that public health strategies promote healthy lifestyles and target high-risk groups through early screening and awareness campaigns, using evidence-based interventions to reduce the breast cancer burden.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Determinants; Low- and middle-income countries; Umbrella review; Upper-middle-income countries.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: No ethical approval was needed because the data was collected and analyzed from previously reported research where informed consent had been obtained from participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Li Y, Song W, Gao P, Guan X, Wang B, Zhang L, et al. Global, regional, and National burden of breast, cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer and their risk factors among women from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2050: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021. BMC Cancer. 2025;25(1):330. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sharma R. Breast cancer incidence, mortality and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) are associated with human development, 1990–2016: evidence from global burden of disease study 2016. Breast Cancer. 2019;26:428–45. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
