Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):879.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12924-1.

Long-term trends in specialized outpatient health care utilization: an analysis in the context of a primary health care reform

Affiliations

Long-term trends in specialized outpatient health care utilization: an analysis in the context of a primary health care reform

Hannes Kohnke et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: As primary health care forms the basis of the health care system, it is regarded as an efficient way to address main causes of, and risk factors for, poor health. In the Swedish health care system, general practitioners play a role in facilitating access to specialized health care and in coordinating care from other parts of the health care system. In Sweden, recent marketization efforts in primary health care, particularly the Patient Choice Reform, have adversely impacted geographical equity in access health care. This study aimed to examine long-term trends in specialized outpatient health care utilization in the context of the Patient Choice Reform, and to do so in regard to demographical, socioeconomic and geographical determinants of health care utilization.

Method: Register data from Region Skåne, the third most populous region in Sweden, was retrieved and a cohort was constructed, describing individuals’ health care utilization between 2007 and 2017. Utilization was measured as the number of outpatient visits to physicians in specialized health care, and based on trajectory analyses trends in utilization were identified. Differences in demographic, geographic and socioeconomic determinants between subgroups with distinct utilization trends were analyzed using logistic regression models.

Results: A closed cohort of 659,298 individuals was constructed. Utilization increased in all sex and age groups except for younger women where utilization decreased. Increased utilization was, in younger individuals, associated with lower socioeconomic status and, in older individuals, with higher socioeconomic status. In all female groups, increased utilization was associated with residence in urban areas and decreased utilization to residence in non-urban areas.

Conclusion: This study provides key insights into long-term trends in outpatient SHC utilization during a time period that overlaps with the Patient Choice Reform. The impact of socioeconomic and geographic determinants on utilization varies in magnitude and direction between different age groups of the population in a similar pattern as previously described for primary health care. However, unlike previously reported trends of primary health care utilization, specialized health care utilization in younger women is decreasing.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-025-12924-1.

Keywords: Delivery of health care; Health care utilization; Health equity; Health policy; Patient choice; Privatization; Sweden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved and the Informed consent was waived by The Regional Ethical Review Board at Lund University. (Dnr 2019 − 00168). All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Generic trajectory analysis output. On the Y-axis, the number of annual physician visits in specialized health care per individual are categorized by 4 utilization-groups corresponding to; 0 visits, 1 visit, 2–3 visits, and more than 3 visits. From Kohnke et al. [24]. CC by 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Published 23 November 2023

Similar articles

References

    1. Hälso- och sjukvårdslag [Health and Medical Services Act]. SFS 2017:30. Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 2017. Available from: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningss.... Accessed 20 May 2025.
    1. Fotaki M. Is patient choice the future of health care systems? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2013;1(2):121–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bevan G, Helderman JK, Wilsford D. Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010;5(3):251–67. - PubMed
    1. Schlesinger M. Choice cuts: parsing policymakers’ pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010;5(3):365–87. - PubMed
    1. Barr DA, Fenton L, Blane D. The claim for patient choice and equity. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(4):271–4. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources