Hospitalization experience and associated factors among Chinese patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 40598081
- PMCID: PMC12210803
- DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03489-9
Hospitalization experience and associated factors among Chinese patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Although hospitalization experience is recognized as critical to patient well-being and nursing quality, its role within Chinese healthcare system remains understudied, particularly among cancer patients. This study aims to capture the associated factors of Chinese cancer patients' hospitalization experience, with the goal of informing targeted improvements in care delivery.
Methods: A convenience sampling method was employed to survey 351 cancer inpatients from three tertiary hospitals in China from September to November 2024. Data were collected using the Patient-reported Experience Measure for Cancer (PREM-C), the Hospital Service Quality Questionnaire (HSQQ), and the Family APGAR Index (APGAR). The acquired data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, univariate analysis, and multiple linear regression.
Results: The mean scores for PREM-C, HSQQ, and APGAR were 92.47 ± 8.62, 82.22 ± 8.05, and 8.26 ± 1.45, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated four factors associated with cancer patients' overall hospitalization experience, including payment of medical costs (β = -0.170, p < 0.001), type of cancer (β = 0.128, p = 0.026), quality of hospital services (β = 0.367, p < 0.001), and family function (β = 0.163, p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Patients with higher-quality hospital services, stronger family functioning, or medical insurance report more positive hospitalization experiences. Gynecological cancer patients also report better experiences than those with other cancer types. This study highlights hospital service quality and family functioning as key influences on cancer patients' hospitalization experience, advocating tailored support for different cancer types.
Clinical trial number: Not applicable.
Keywords: Cancer; Cross-sectional study; Hospitalization experience; Nursing quality; Patients.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Xuzhou Medical University (XZHMUz-24128). All participants signed an informed consent form, and those who attended the program would receive a gift after each session. They were also made aware of their right to withdraw their participation at any time. All participants were anonymous. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of culturally focused interventions in increasing the satisfaction of hospitalized Asian patients: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):219-56. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003048. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27635753
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017. PMID: 28800057
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
References
-
- Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. - PubMed
-
- Tao YL. Sinicization and revision of the spiritual coping questionnaire and its application to advanced cancer patients. Southern Medical University; 2021.
-
- Reid C, Jones L, Janda M, et al. Development and testing of a patient-reported experience measure for cancer: A cross-sectional survey. J Adv Nurs. 2024;80(1):312–27. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources