Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):893.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07451-w.

Assessing research self-efficacy and attitudes among medical students: a quasi-experimental study evaluating the impact of a structured training program

Adebayo Falola  1   2 , Toluwase Oluwajomiloju Ogundipe  3   4 , Jonas Paul Ibekwe  3   5 , Daniel Esanju  3   5 , Chukwuebuka Asogwa  3   5 , Balgees Altayib  3   6 , Ketra Venesa Nandera  3   7 , Boluwatife David Elusiyan  3   5 , Chijioke David Mgbeobukwa  3   5 , Miracle Ifeoluwani Abraham  3   5 , Jolly Akor Thomas  3   5 , Afeezah Wojuade  3   5 , Edward Ephraim Baka  3   8 , Akinrayo Olufunbi Oyedele  3   9 , Wahida Hamad Ali  3   10 , Grace Oluwadarasimi Adebesin  3   5 , Pezo Norah Kachaka  3   11 , Marvellous Adelaja  3   5 , Felicia Ojo  3   5 , Ademola Obakayode  3   5
Affiliations

Assessing research self-efficacy and attitudes among medical students: a quasi-experimental study evaluating the impact of a structured training program

Adebayo Falola et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Exposure of medical students to research improves their scientific output and future involvement in research. This is particularly important for Africa, where, despite the high disease burden, the continent contributes only 2% of the global research output. An important approach to address this is early introduction of students to research. This study aims to assess the effects of a training organized by the Federation of African Medical Students' Associations, on self-efficacy and attitudes of medical students to research.

Methods: A pre- and post-training cross-sectional survey of medical students who participated in the research training was conducted. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data was collected using pre-tested self-administered questionnaires, and was descriptively analyzed. The Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory-12 scale was used to investigate self-efficacy, and the Attitudes Towards Research scale was used to assess attitudinal changes. Mann-Whitney U test, and Independent Samples t-test were used to compare pre- and post- intervention scores.

Results: A total of 223 students from eleven African countries who registered for the training were enrolled. However, 152 completed the intervention. Age range was 15-40, with peak age being 21-25. Male to female ratio was 1:1.1. Majority (67%) of the participants were from Nigeria, and in their fourth year (27%). The scores of all six self-efficacy factors increased after the intervention with statistical significance. These included designing and collecting (27.3% to 57.0% p < 0.001); reporting, interpreting, and presenting (28.4% to 60.3% p < 0.001); conceptualizing and collaborating (32.7% to 63.2% p < 0.001); planning (31.8% to 60.7% p < 0.001); funding (21.3% to 53.7% p < 0.001); protecting (33.6% to 65.7% p < 0.001). Positive attitudes towards research increased significantly after the intervention with a mean score of 74.6% to 81.0% (p = 0.001), while negative attitudes decreased (48.9% to 42.9% p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Structured research training improves the self-efficacy and attitudes of students towards research, and thus should be incorporated into curricula. There is a need for longitudinal studies to further establish the long-term effects of early exposure of medical students to research.

Keywords: Africa; Medical education; Research training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was sought and obtained from the University of Ibadan; University College Hospital Ethics Committee (UI/UCH EC), Ibadan, Nigeria. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection. The study was conducted in adherence to the declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of study participants per country
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Lancet. 2002;359(9300):57–61. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5. - PubMed
    1. Jacob H. Why all doctors should be involved in research. BMJ. 2016;352. 10.1136/bmj.i164.
    1. Pawar DB, Gawde SR, Marathe PA. Awareness about medical research among resident doctors in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional survey. Perspect Clin Res. 2012;3(2):57–61. 10.4103/2229-3485.96446. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhuiya T, Makaryus AN. The importance of engaging in scientific research during medical training. Int J Angiol. 2023;32(03):153–7. 10.1055/s-0042-1759542. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed R, Farooq A, Storie D, Hartling L, Oswald A. Building capacity for education research among clinical educators in the health professions: a BEME (Best Evidence Medical Education) systematic review of the outcomes of interventions: BEME guide no. 34. Med Teach. 2016;38(2):123–36. 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112893. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources