Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences regarding post-traumatic stress disorder after 2 years of the last global pandemic
- PMID: 40598425
- PMCID: PMC12219579
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13004-0
Exploring healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences regarding post-traumatic stress disorder after 2 years of the last global pandemic
Abstract
Background: The adverse mental health consequences of the coronavirus epidemic for healthcare workers (HCWs) affect the quality of care and patient satisfaction; HCWs need to maintain good mental health during and after an epidemic, especially in low-income countries like Iran, where human resources in the health care sector are insufficient. The aims of this study are to explore the perceptions and experiences of healthcare workers regarding post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after 2 years of the last Global Pandemic.
Methods: We conducted the present study in Mazandarn province, Iran, using a qualitative approach based on conventional content analysis. Participants were Iranian healthcare workers (HCWs) aged 30 and above, all with a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Eligible candidates were selected through both purposive sampling (with maximum variation) and snowball sampling to ensure diversity in demographic characteristics and lived experience of phenomena. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, continuing until data saturation was reached. The interviews were analyzed using MAXQDA10 software, following the conventional content analysis approach as outlined by Graneheim and Lundman.
Results: Our analysis yielded five main themes and 18 categories: [1] Helplessness, including six categories: physical consequences, psychological reactions, feeling of guilt, job-related consequences, social consequences, and lack of support; [2] poor risk management, encompassing four categories: inadequate vocational skills training, poor anger management, low sense of security, and hazardous work environments; [3] life and death experience, with two categories: hopelessness about life and the future, and witnessing unexpected deaths; [4] seeking support, comprising three categories: social support, psychological support, and organizational support, and [5] self-care, involving three categories: personal responsibility for health, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and building resilience against PTSD.
Conclusion: Our findings reveal a concerning picture of the mental health status of Iranian HCWs, particularly regarding the impact of the most recent pandemic. Many participants reported significant symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety, and PTSD, all of which profoundly affect their overall well-being. The most prominent themes identified were feelings of helplessness, inadequate risk management, encounters with life-and-death situations, and insufficient support systems. Alarmingly, several HCWs expressed intentions to leave their current positions or exit the healthcare profession altogether. Such trends pose a serious threat to the stability of Iran's healthcare system. Consequently, proactive, solution-oriented strategies must be developed-both at the national level and in collaboration with international stakeholders-to mitigate the ongoing healthcare workforce shortage in Iran and address the broader global risk of healthcare service disruption.
Keywords: Healthcare workers; PTSD; Pandemic; Qualitative.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Ethics Committee of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in Mazandaran, Sari, Iran, has approved the protocol for the current study [code number: IR.MAZUMS.REC.1402.476; Grant No. 18533]. All the study procedures were carried out under the principles in the Declaration of Helsinki 1964 and its amendments later on. Written and oral informed consent were obtained from the participants prior to participate in the study. And although all interviews were audiotaped and transcribed with the participant’s consent. HCWs where be assured of the confidentiality of their information and identities. Furthermore, they were be informed that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage of the study, and that their decision to refuse contribution at any time was not influence or change the quality of services provided to them. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec;13(23):1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39708055
-
Pre-deployment programmes for building resilience in military and frontline emergency service personnel.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD013242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013242.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34870330 Free PMC article.
-
High Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on French Healthcare Workers: An Observational Cohort Study of PTSD, Depression and Burn-Out.Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70401. doi: 10.1111/hex.70401. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 40836788 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38009552 Free PMC article.
-
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5:CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2. PMID: 35037252 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
-
- Andrews HS, Herman JD, Gandhi RT. Treatments for COVID-19. Annu Rev Med. 2024;75(1):145–57. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical