Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):212.
doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05455-x.

Evaluating the biological quality of mass-reared Anopheles arabiensis males irradiated as pupae or as adults

Affiliations

Evaluating the biological quality of mass-reared Anopheles arabiensis males irradiated as pupae or as adults

Samar Eisa et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: The success of a sterile insect technique programme to control target mosquito populations depends on producing high-quality sterile males that can compete with wild males to inseminate wild females, to consequently inhibit procreation. To succeed, the released males require high biological quality. The quality of laboratory-reared, sterile males can be affected by the rearing conditions, handling, transportation, and irradiation. Limiting the cumulative damage caused by all these processes is key to maintain sterile male performance in the field once released. The ideal life stage to irradiate Anopheles arabiensis males is still an important question for this species. This study aims to assess the dose response of irradiated males at pupal versus adult stages and use quality control (QC) parameters to assess the feasibility and possible advantages of shifting to adult irradiation in this species.

Methods: Laboratory reared An. arabiensis males were irradiated as late-stage pupae or as adults at varying doses to compare the radiosensitivity in both developmental stages. Males irradiated at fully sterilizing doses were further subjected to quality control tests to compare the quality of males irradiated at adult versus pupae stages. The QC parameters tested included flight ability, longevity and mating competitiveness.

Results: The results show that adults do not require more radiation dose to achieve the target sterility, and females are more radiosensitive than males. Longevity, flight ability and mating competitiveness were improved significantly in males irradiated as adults compared to that of males irradiated as pupae.

Conclusions: Given the challenges in synchronizing pupation in a mass rearing setting and achieving a homogenous age (i.e. late-stage pupae) of collected pupae in this species, as well as these findings on the overall improvement of sterile male quality in the males irradiated as adults, this report provides a strong argument for irradiation protocols to shift towards adult stage irradiation in SIT programmes against An. arabiensis.

Keywords: Fitness; Life stage; Malaria vector; Quality control; Sterile insect technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dose response curves. Dose–response curves, fitted with the Gompertz function, for the effect of radiation dose on the sterility rate according to the sex and the life stage. Blue lines show male adult (left panel) and pupae (right panel) dose response, and pink lines show female adult (left panel) and pupae (right panel) dose response
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Male longevity. Survival curves of An. arabiensis males irradiated as pupae and adult, as compared to the non-irradiated males. Males irradiated as pupae (blue dotted line) showed reduced longevity over 2 weeks
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flight ability. Escape rates of males irradiated at pupal or adult stage, compared to non-irradiated control males. The box plot shows the mean ± SE, and median and upper and lower quartiles
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mating competitiveness. Hatch rates resulting from mating crosses with males irradiated at adult (A) or pupal (P) stage compared to fertile (Cf) and sterile (Cs) controls. The box plot shows the mean ± SE, and median and upper and lower quartiles. Higher hatch rates in the pupal irradiation treatment group show reduced competitiveness of these males compared to males irradiated as adults treatment group

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria. Geneva, World Health Organization. who int/media/docs/default-source/malaria/gts/who-global-technicalstrategy-for-malaria-update-4apr2021 pdf. 2021;
    1. Coulibaly B, Kone R, Barry MS, Emerson B, Coulibaly MB, Niare O, et al. Malaria vector populations across ecological zones in Guinea Conakry and Mali. West Africa Malar J. 2016;15:191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mustafa MSEK, Jaal Z, Abu Kashawa S, Mohd Nor SA. Population genetics of Anopheles arabiensis, the primary malaria vector in the Republic of Sudan. Malar J. 2021;20:469. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oliva CF, Vreysen MJB, Dupé S, Lees RS, Gilles JRL, Gouagna L-C, et al. Current status and future challenges for controlling malaria with the sterile insect technique: technical and social perspectives. Acta Trop. 2014;132S:S130–9. - PubMed
    1. Drake JM, Beier JC. Ecological niche and potential distribution of Anopheles arabiensis in Africa in 2050. Malar J. 2014;13:213. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources