Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;95(9):783-790.
doi: 10.1111/josh.70046. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

Advancing Condom Availability in Chicago Public Schools: Lessons From a Multi-Sector Partnership

Affiliations

Advancing Condom Availability in Chicago Public Schools: Lessons From a Multi-Sector Partnership

Julia Liu et al. J Sch Health. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Condom availability programs (CAPs) in schools are a strategy intended to reduce rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancies among youth. Despite evidence on comprehensive sexual health education and contraceptives, these initiatives often face inconsistent implementation.

Contribution to practice: This retrospective case study examines the evolution of CAP in Chicago Public Schools (CPS), emphasizing on the cooperation between CPS and the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH). This case study details the transition of ad-hoc distribution to a universal condom distribution. Through interagency collaboration, CPS and CDPH developed a sustainable and scalable model for increasing access to sexual health resources into school settings.

Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: This initiative highlights the importance of policy-driven health intervention in school settings and how structured collaboration can ensure equitable access to condoms. This demonstrates how institutional relationships can work together to enhance adolescents' health and wellbeing.

Conclusion: The success of a universal CAP in school districts illuminates the value of cross-sector partnerships that strengthens health equity and can serve as a blueprint for other districts who face similar challenges in adolescent reproductive health services.

Keywords: evaluation; policy implementation; school.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Steiner R. J., Liddon N., Swartzendruber A. L., Pazol K., and Sales J. M., “Moving the Message Beyond the Methods: Toward Integration of Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV Prevention,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 54, no. 3 (2018): 440–443, 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luca D. L., Stevens J., Rotz D., Goesling B., and Lutz R., “Evaluating Teen Options for Preventing Pregnancy: Impacts and Mechanisms,” Journal of Health Economics 77 (2021): 102459, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102459. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fisher C. M., Kerr L., Ezer P., Kneip Pelster A. D., Coleman J. D., and Tibbits M., “Adolescent Perspectives on Addressing Teenage Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Classroom and Beyond,” Sex Education 20, no. 1 (2020): 90–100, 10.1080/14681811.2019.1618257. - DOI
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , “STI Incidence and Prevalence Cost Factsheet,” https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact‐sheets/std/STI‐Incidence‐Preva....
    1. Tebb K. P. and Brindis C. D., “Understanding the Psychological Impacts of Teenage Pregnancy Through a Socio‐Ecological Framework and Life Course Approach,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 40, no. 1/2 (2022): 107–115, 10.1055/s-0041-1741518. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources