A Bridge Between Cultures for Better Patient Care: A Qualitative Study of the Nurse-Led Rapid Response Team
- PMID: 40599134
- PMCID: PMC12215604
- DOI: 10.1111/scs.70064
A Bridge Between Cultures for Better Patient Care: A Qualitative Study of the Nurse-Led Rapid Response Team
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) are crucial for patient safety, yet their effectiveness hinges on organisational factors, clinical culture, inter-professional collaboration and ward nurse attitudes. Understanding ward nurses' perceptions is vital for optimising RRT impact on patient care and safety culture.
Aims: This study aimed to explore general ward registered nurses' perceptions of nurse-led RRTs, focusing on their collaborative experiences and reasons for team activation.
Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was employed. Focus group interviews were conducted with 22 general ward nurses across three Danish hospitals, recruited via purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview guide facilitated discussions. Interpretive content analysis with a hermeneutical approach was used to identify key themes.
Results: Participants expressed a predominantly positive perception of RRTs, encapsulated in the core theme: 'A vital and dynamic resource, benefitting patient care and nursing practice'. Key categories included: 'Perceiving patient safety as the main purpose of RRT', 'Supporting nurses' sense of security', 'Delivering practical assistance and teaching', 'Providing patient-centred care' and 'Fostering constructive communication and collaboration'. Nurses found experienced physicians supportive but expressed greater confidence in RRT-nurses compared to junior physicians. Frustration with a lack of physician involvement in treatment limitation and end-of-life care discussions was also noted.
Conclusions: Nurse-led RRTs are valued by ward nurses, providing essential support and bridging multidisciplinary collaboration and communication. However, limitations in the RRT's teaching role suggest a need for supplementary educational strategies. Shared decision-making regarding treatment limitation and end-of-life care is crucial for maximising RRT benefits.
Limitations: Findings may have limited transferability due to the study's specific healthcare context.
Keywords: communication; end‐of‐life care decision‐making; hospital rapid response team; nursing; patient care; teaching.
© 2025 The Author(s). Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic College of Caring Science.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Brouwers J., Cox B., Van Wilder A., et al., “The Future of Hospital Quality of Care Policy: A Multi‐Stakeholder Discrete Choice Experiment in Flanders, Belgium,” Health Policy 125, no. 12 (2021): 1565–1573. - PubMed
-
- McGaughey J., O'Halloran P., Porter S., and Blackwood B., “Early Warning Systems and Rapid Response to the Deteriorating Patient in Hospital: A Systematic Realist Review,” Journal of Advanced Nursing 73, no. 12 (2017): 2877–2891. - PubMed
-
- Dresser S., Teel C., and Peltzer J., “Frontline Nurses' Clinical Judgment in Recognizing, Understanding, and Responding to Patient Deterioration: A Qualitative Study,” International Journal of Nursing Studies 139 (2023): 104436. - PubMed
-
- Douw G., Huisman‐de Waal G., van Zanten A. R. H., van der Hoeven J. G., and Schoonhoven L., “Nurses' ‘Worry’ as Predictor of Deteriorating Surgical Ward Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Dutch‐Early‐Nurse‐Worry‐Indicator‐Score,” International Journal of Nursing Studies 59 (2016): 134–140. - PubMed
-
- Martland J., Chamberlain D., Hutton A., and Smigielski M., “Communication and General Concern Criterion Prior to Activation of the Rapid Response Team: A Grounded Theory,” Australian Health Review 40, no. 5 (2016): 477–483. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
