[Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice]
- PMID: 40599298
- PMCID: PMC12207040
- DOI: 10.12182/20250360102
[Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is an effective treatment for esophageal cancer, and there has been growing attention on the importance of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing the surgery. Epidural analgesia is the preferred analgesic approach for open esophagectomy. With the development of surgical technology, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has become the mainstream surgical approach. However, no conclusion has been reached concerning whether epidural analgesia is still the preferred analgesic approach for MIE. Herein, we analyzed the relevant literature published in recent years and found that epidural analgesia continued to be an important analgesic approach for MIE, offering the best analgesic effect. Epidural analgesia can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, improve the quality of life, and reduce the stress response. Adverse effects can be minimized through accurate selection of epidural puncture segments, individualized medication, and multimodal analgesia strategies. In the future, precision-based multimodal analgesia can be achieved using emerging technologies such as big data analytics and artificial intelligence.
食管切除术作为治疗食管癌的有效手段,其术后疼痛管理的重要性日益受到关注,硬膜外镇痛是开放食管切除术首选的镇痛方式。随着外科技术的发展,微创食管切除术(minimally invasive esophagectomy, MIE)已成为主流手术方式,硬膜外镇痛是否仍是MIE的首选镇痛方式,目前尚无定论。本综述通过分析近年来的相关文献,发现硬膜外镇痛仍然是MIE的重要镇痛方式,镇痛效果最佳,可以减少肺部并发症,改善生活质量,减少应激反应。通过准确选择穿刺节段、个体化用药和多模式镇痛可以减少不良反应。未来可以使用大数据和人工智能达到精准多模式镇痛。
Keywords: Analgesia, epidural; Complications; Esophagectomy; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Review.
© 2025《四川大学学报(医学版)》编辑部 Copyright ©2025 Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Science Edition).
Conflict of interest statement
利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
Figures


Similar articles
-
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 16;(7):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 04;6:CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3. PMID: 26184397 Updated.
-
Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD011989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011989.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28407220 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33. Minerva Chir. 2009. PMID: 19365313
-
Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD009642. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009642.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29864216 Free PMC article.
-
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22419342 Free PMC article.
References
-
-
LOW D E, ALLUM W, De MANZONI G, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World J Surg, 2019, 43(2): 299-330.
-
-
- 中华医学会麻醉学分会麻醉与肿瘤学组, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤麻醉与镇痛专业委员会; 缪长虹 食管癌手术加速康复策略麻醉专家共识. 中华医学杂志. 2024;104(3):171–179. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230807-00177. - DOI
- Oncology and Anesthesiology Group of Chinese Society of Anesthesiology, The Society of Oncological Anesthesia and Analgesia Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; MIAO C Expert consensus on anesthesia in enhanced recovery after surgery for esophageal cancer surgery. Natl Med J China. 2024;104(3):171–179. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230807-00177. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical