Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17:12:1569067.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1569067. eCollection 2025.

Task-specific morphological and kinematic differences in Lipizzan horses

Affiliations

Task-specific morphological and kinematic differences in Lipizzan horses

Manja Zupan Šemrov et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: Equine locomotion emerges from a dynamic interplay between morphology, biomechanics, and functional demands. This study examines the relationship between morphological measurements and gait kinematics in Lipizzan horses, a breed renowned for its diverse work tasks and standardized environmental conditions. These horses offer a unique opportunity to explore task-specific adaptations in biomechanics, with significant implications for breeding strategies and welfare practices.

Materials and methods: The study involved 71 healthy Lipizzan horses that were housed at the Lipica stud farm and performed various work tasks. Morphological measurements were taken with the help of a sartorial meter and an equine measuring stick to determine head and body measurements. Both the left and right sides of the body were measured to ensure consistency. Kinematic data, including regularity, symmetry, cadence, dorsoventral power, propulsion power, stride length and speed, were recorded using the Equimetrix accelerometer at a sampling rate of 100 Hz. The data was collected during several walks and trots where the horses were led over a 50-meter track.

Results: Task-based analysis revealed strong links between morphology and gait in four working groups, with distal limb measurements, especially hoof and pastern lengths, most consistently associated with stride and rhythm parameters. No significant associations were found at the whole-cohort level. Several morphological measurements showed contrasting effects across working groups, and half of the bilaterally measured traits revealed side-specific correlations. The clearest patterns emerged in horses used for general training and riding school. In horses in general training, strong associations were found between distal limb measurements and stride length or cadence, particularly during walk. In riding school horses, broader body measurements were linked to kinematic parameters including propulsion power, dorsoventral power, and symmetry.

Discussion: This study highlights the dynamic interplay between conformation and functional demands in clinically sound horses. Rather than exerting fixed effects, morphological measurements interacted with work type to shape gait expression, even in the absence of pathology. These findings underscore the need to consider both structure and task when evaluating locomotion. Integrating morphometric assessment into training and selection strategies may support performance, soundness, and welfare in healthy working horses.

Keywords: equine; locomotion; morphology; non-pathological; positive experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The use of a sartorial meter (A) and measuring stick (B) for morphological measurements.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Head morphological measurements: (A) front view, (B) profile view.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Body morphological measurements: (A) front view, (B) profile view.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The application of the device: (A) placement of the device, (B) example of kinematic assessment during walk.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scatterplots of the eight strongest correlations. A detected outlier is marked in red.

Similar articles

References

    1. Biewener A, Patek S. Animal locomotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press; (2008).
    1. Barrey E. Methods, applications and limitations of gait analysis in horses. Vet J. (1999) 157:7–22. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.1998.0297, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hildebrand M. Symmetrical gaits of horses: gaits can be expressed numerically and analyzed graphically to reveal their nature and relationships. Science. (1965) 150:701–8. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3697.701 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jayes AS, Alexander RMN. Mechanics of locomotion of dogs (Canis familiaris) and sheep (Ovis aries). J Zool. (1978) 185:289–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1978.tb03334.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gasc J-P. Comparative aspects of gait, scaling and mechanics in mammals. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. (2001) 131:121–33. doi: 10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00457-3, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources