Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Mar;63(Suppl1):86-89.
doi: 10.20471/acc.2024.63.s1.16.

VALVE-IN-VALVE IMPLANTATION GONE SOUTH: A CASE REPORT

Affiliations
Case Reports

VALVE-IN-VALVE IMPLANTATION GONE SOUTH: A CASE REPORT

Robert Bernat et al. Acta Clin Croat. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Valve-in-Valve (ViV) procedures for failed surgical bioprostheses are becoming increasingly common. We present a case of a 73-year-old male patient with significant comorbidities who underwent a primary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with an Evolut 29 mm (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) valve. This TAVI-prosthesis implantation failed due to the inability to fix the valve at the appropriate height to achieve an optimal hemodynamic result. The valve had to be snared and pulled into an adequate position and was then fixed by an implantation of another TAVI-prosthesis (29 mm Sapien S3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) with optimal final result. The patient was discharged after significant clinical improvement and without further complications.

Keywords: complications; structural interventions; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preprocedural AR (Perimount 27 mm)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Positioning of the Evolut 29mm prosthesis in degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valve.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Migration of the Evolut 29 mm prosthesis into the left ventricle and severe AR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Simultaneous Sapien S3 29 mm TAVI-implantation and pulling of the Evolut prosthesis in the direction of the aorta by double snare engagement using Agilis sheaths.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Optimal position of both TAVI prostheses and absence of AR.

References

    1. Edelman JJ, Khan JM, Rogers T, Shults C, Satler LF, Ben-Dor II, et al. Valve-in-Valve TAVR: State-of-the-Art Review. Innovations (Phila). 2019. August;14(4):299–310. 10.1177/1556984519858020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sá MPBO, Van den Eynde J, Simonato M, Cavalcanti LRP, Doulamis IP, Weixler V, et al. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. January 25;14(2):211–20. 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarantini G, Dvir D, Tang GHL. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves. EuroIntervention. 2021. October 20;17(9):709–19. 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00157 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources