Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 22;2(Suppl 1):e001154.
doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001154. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study

Affiliations

Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study

James Ndimbii et al. BMJ Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Incorporating SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) into routine care settings can facilitate efficient case identification and management in low-resource settings. We assessed the time required to complete SARS-CoV-2 screening and Ag-RDT testing in maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH), HIV and tuberculosis clinics in selected facilities in Kenya and Cameroon.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive, time-motion analysis comparing SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing through standard-of-care 'screen-and-test' (ST) and 'test-all' (TA) models. Study staff observed and documented time in minutes taken by healthcare workers to provide SARS-CoV-2 services. Time taken per model was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) or Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: A total of 116 observations of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing using Ag-RDTs were conducted. The overall time spent on SARS-CoV-2 activities for clients was a median of 34 min (IQR: 25, 41) for ST sites and 21 min (IQR: 15, 27) at TA sites, p=0.001. Screening took a median time of 3 min (IQR: 2, 7) at ST sites. Among activities observed, test processing took the longest at 19 min (IQR: 17, 21) in ST sites versus 16 min (IQR: 15, 18.5) in TA sites, p=0.001.

Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing services in routine healthcare services took slightly longer in the ST model compared with the TA model, with the majority of additional time needed for sample processing/testing in both models. However, in high-volume clinics, the additional 21 min of personnel and client time needed to test every attendee may not be feasible compared with the 34 min of additional time needed for testing only eligible attendees. When considering the model to use, clinic workload and human resource availability need to be considered to manage the time required for providing SARS-CoV-2 services.

Trial registration number: NCT05382130 17 May 2022.

Keywords: COVID-19; Public Health; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing services observed. Study flowchart of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing procedures observed disaggregated by ST and TA model. ST, screen-and-test; TA, test-all.

Similar articles

References

    1. Duma Z, Chuturgoon AA, Ramsuran V, et al. The challenges of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing in low-middle income countries and possible cost-effective measures in resource-limited settings. Global Health. 2022;18:5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00796-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karanja S, Aduda J, Thuo R, et al. Utilization of digital tools to enhance COVID-19 and tuberculosis testing and linkage to care: A cross-sectional evaluation study among Bodaboda motorbike riders in the Nairobi Metropolis, Kenya. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0290575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290575. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muttamba W, O’Hare BA-M, Saxena V, et al. A systematic review of strategies adopted to scale up COVID-19 testing in low-, middle- and high-income countries. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e060838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060838. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khandker SS, Nik Hashim NHH, Deris ZZ, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Test Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 17,171 Suspected COVID-19 Patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3493. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onsongo SN, Otieno K, van Duijn S, et al. Performance of a rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 in Kenya. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;102:115591. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115591. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources