Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun 17:16:1562060.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1562060. eCollection 2025.

Abdominal obesity prevalence in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ATP III and IDF criteria

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Abdominal obesity prevalence in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ATP III and IDF criteria

Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Abdominal obesity (AO) represents a significant cardiovascular risk factor with distinctive characteristics in Latin American populations. Its prevalence has increased substantially in recent decades, although estimates vary according to the diagnostic criteria.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of AO in Latin American populations through a systematic review with meta-analysis, comparing ATP III and IDF criteria.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Observational studies evaluating AO prevalence in Latin American populations using either ATP III (≥102/88 cm) or IDF (≥90/80 cm) criteria were included. Meta-regressions were performed to assess the influence of publication year and sample size.

Results: Sixty-one studies were included (n=281,694 participants). The pooled prevalence according to ATP III criteria was 40% (95% CI: 34-46%) and 62% (95% CI: 56-68%) according to IDF criteria. Sex-stratified analysis revealed significantly higher prevalences in women (ATP III: 50% vs 27%; IDF: 74.3% vs 46.8%). Temporal meta-regression demonstrated an upward trend, particularly in studies utilizing IDF criteria, while sample size showed no significant influence on prevalence estimates. Substantial geographic variations were observed, with Mexico and Venezuela exhibiting the highest prevalences. Heterogeneity was considerably high (I²>99%) across all analyses.

Conclusions: AO prevalence in Latin America is high and demonstrates significant sexual dimorphism. These findings challenge the validity of current cut-off points and suggest the need to develop Latin American-specific criteria based on clinically relevant outcomes.

Keywords: Latin America; abdominal obesity; meta-analysis; prevalence; systematic review; waist circumference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot* of AO prevalence meta-analysis according to ATP III criteria in Latin America. * The squares represent the point prevalence of each study, while the horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals. The size of the squares is proportional to the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis. The diamond at the bottom represents the combined prevalence estimate with its 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot* of AO prevalence meta-analysis according to IDF criteria in Latin America, * The squares represent the point prevalence of each study, while the horizontal lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals. The size of the squares is proportional to the relative weight of each study in the meta-analysis. The diamond at the bottom represents the combined prevalence estimate with its 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Map of Latin America with the prevalence of LA according to ATP III and IDF.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Meta-regression of the prevalence of AO – ATP III by year of publication in Latin American countries.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Meta-regression of the prevalence of OA – IDF by year of publication in Latin American countries.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Acosta-Cazares B, Acuin C, et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2017) 390:2627–42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galicia L, de Romaña DL, Harding KB, De-Regil LM, Grajeda R. Tackling malnutrition in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and opportunities. Rev Panam Salud Publica Pan Am J Public Health. (2016) 40:138–46. - PubMed
    1. Aschner P, Buendía R, Brajkovich I, Gonzalez A, Figueredo R, Juarez XE, et al. Determination of the cutoff point for waist circumference that establishes the presence of abdominal obesity in Latin American men and women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2011) 93:243–7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.05.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferrari G, Giannichi B, Resende B, Paiva L, Rocha R, Falbel F, et al. The economic burden of overweight and obesity in Brazil: perspectives for the Brazilian Unified Health System. Public Health. (2022) 207:82–7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.03.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miranda JJ, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Corvalan C, Hyder AA, Lazo-Porras M, Oni T, et al. Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Med. (2019) 25:1667–79. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0644-7 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources