Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;32(10):1449-1459.
doi: 10.1111/iju.70162. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

Response to First-Line Chemotherapy Predicts Response to Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Affiliations

Response to First-Line Chemotherapy Predicts Response to Maintenance Avelumab Therapy in Japanese Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Satoshi Inoue et al. Int J Urol. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The association between the response to first-line chemotherapy and maintenance of avelumab remains unclear. We identified factors associated with the response to avelumab in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma using real-world data.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 100 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with maintenance avelumab therapy between March 2021 and April 2024 at Nagoya University and nine affiliated hospitals. The complete/partial-response group was defined as patients with complete response or partial response as the best response to first-line chemotherapy. The stable disease group was defined as patients with stable disease as the best response to first-line chemotherapy.

Results: Seven patients (7.0%) achieved complete response, 65 (65.0%) achieved partial response, and 28 (28.0%) achieved stable disease as the best response to first-line chemotherapy. Regarding avelumab therapy, the complete/partial-response group had significantly better progression-free survival than the stable disease group (median: 11.1 vs. 3.2 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, the best response to first-line chemotherapy was the only independent risk factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.844, 95% confidence interval = 1.002-3.394; p = 0.049). Overall survival was significantly shorter in the stable disease group than in the complete/partial-response group (median: 14.1 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed significant associations between poor overall survival and performance status (hazard ratio = 2.175, 95% confidence interval = 1.030-4.592; p = 0.042) and the best response to first-line chemotherapy (hazard ratio = 4.174, 95% confidence interval = 1.975-8.824; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The best response to first-line chemotherapy may predict the clinical outcome of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab.

Keywords: avelumab; carcinoma; immunotherapy; prognosis; risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Shusuke Akamatsu is an Editorial Board member of the International Journal of Urology and a co‐author of this article. To minimize bias, he was excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Clinical responses to first‐line (1 L) chemotherapy and avelumab treatment. (a) Frequency of best overall response to avelumab in all patients, the CR/PR group, and the SD group. Kaplan–Meier curve for time to progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients. (b) PFS of all patients. (c) PFS of all patients according to the best response to first‐line (1 L) chemotherapy. (d) OS of all patients. (e) OS of all patients according to the best response to 1 L chemotherapy. CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan–Meier curve for time to additional progression‐free survival (a) and additional overall survival (b) in patients who received 1 year of avelumab.

References

    1. von der Maase H., Sengelov L., Roberts J. T., et al., “Long‐Term Survival Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin, With Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Bladder Cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 (2005): 4602–4608. - PubMed
    1. Powles T., Park S. H., Voog E., et al., “Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 383 (2020): 1218–1230. - PubMed
    1. Powles T., Valderrama B. P., Gupta S., et al., “Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Advanced Urothelial Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 390 (2024): 875–888. - PubMed
    1. Zhao Y., Xu X., Sun Y., Yu X., Qi Y., and Dai X., “Efficacy and Safety of the First‐Line Systemic Treatments in Patients With Advanced‐Stage Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis,” Frontiers in Oncology 14 (2024): 1468784. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellmunt J., Choueiri T. K., Fougeray R., et al., “Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelial Tract Experiencing Treatment Failure With Platinum‐Containing Regimens,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 28 (2010): 1850–1855. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts