Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;69(5):554-560.
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13860. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

Use and Perceptions of Oncology CT Structured Reports in Australia and New Zealand

K J Brown  1   2 , A Agarwal  1   2 , K L Gormly  2   3
Affiliations

Use and Perceptions of Oncology CT Structured Reports in Australia and New Zealand

K J Brown et al. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Structured oncology template (OT) reports are preferred by physicians. Promoted in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) since 2008, this study investigates the current OT use in ANZ and perceptions around OT reporting.

Methods: An online survey was created and sent to > 350 ANZ radiologists, aiming to gain insight into the current rates of OT reporting, demographic variations, OT types, implementation and perceived advantages and limitations. Statistical analyses were descriptive.

Results: Of 164 respondents, 21% never used an OT; 49% used OTs for > 75% of oncology reports, highest rates were those with 10-20 years of experience (29/61) and reporting > 10 oncology CTs per week (10-20 cases 74% and > 20 cases 72%); 72% used tumour, lymph node and metastases headings; 57% used OTs for all diagnosed cancers; 37% used measurement tables; 70% used subjective terms in their conclusion; and only 4% used synoptic reports. Most selected advantage was 'More clarity and increased communication with clinicians'. Most selected disadvantage was 'lack of experience in template reporting' for those using an OT and 'Inflexible and limits creativity' for those who did not.

Conclusion: OT use is supported across ANZ. Use is higher in those reporting more oncology cases and with 10-20 years of experience. OT reports are perceived as beneficial by those using them, while those who do not perceive them as inflexible.

Keywords: computational intelligence; diagnostic imaging; medical oncology; neoplasm; tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of location and mix of public and private work (n = 115).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Perceived advantages of template reporting.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Perceived disadvantages of template reporting.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Weber T. F., Spurny M., Hasse F. C., et al., “Improving Radiologic Communication in Oncology: A Single‐Centre Experience With Structured Reporting for Cancer Patients,” Insights Into Imaging 11, no. 1 (2020): 1–11, 10.1186/s13244-020-00907-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franconeri A., Boos J., Fang J., et al., “Adnexal Mass Staging CT With a Disease‐Specific Structured Report Compared to Simple Structured Report,” European Radiology 29, no. 9 (2019): 4851–4860, 10.1007/s00330-019-06037-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosmans J. M., Weyler J. J., De Schepper A. M., and Parizel P. M., “The Radiology Report as Seen by Radiologists and Referring Clinicians: Results of the COVER and ROVER Surveys,” Radiology 259, no. 1 (2011): 184–195, 10.1148/radiol.10101045. - DOI - PubMed
    1. (ESR)ESoR , “ESR Paper on Structured Reporting in Radiology,” Insights Into Imaging 9, no. 1 (2018): 1–7, 10.1007/s13244-017-0588-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwartz L. H., Panicek D. M., Berk A. R., Li Y., and Hricak H., “Improving Communication of Diagnostic Radiology Findings Through Structured Reporting,” Radiology 260, no. 1 (2011): 174–181, 10.1148/radiol.11101913. - DOI - PMC - PubMed