Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jul 2:27:e57427.
doi: 10.2196/57427.

Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy Among People With a Stoma: Longitudinal Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Ecological Momentary Assessment of the Quality of Life and Self-Efficacy Among People With a Stoma: Longitudinal Study

William Goodman et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: When a stoma is formed, people with a stoma have to adjust to managing this on a daily basis. There are a number of factors that can impact their self-efficacy to self-manage and their quality of life, including complications with their stoma, body image concerns, stigma, and the changes to their daily routine. Ecological momentary assessment studies in other populations have suggested that these constructs may vary over short periods of time and could be influenced by contextual factors. We, however, do not currently understand how context-specific factors such as what an individual is doing, who they are with, or where they are could impact upon quality of life and self-efficacy in people with a stoma.

Objective: This study aimed to understand whether quality of life and self-efficacy fluctuated over time and whether contextual factors (eg, activity, location, or company) and time of day were associated with quality of life and self-efficacy over the course of a week.

Methods: A smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study was conducted over a 7-day period with measurements taken 3 times a day (morning, afternoon, and evening). Measures included demographic and clinical characteristics of age, gender, and time with a stoma, and self-reported self-efficacy and quality of life in the moment rated from 0 to 100 (with 100 being the best). Multilevel modeling was conducted due to the clustering of responses within individuals, with models run for both self-efficacy and quality of life.

Results: In total, 62 participants completed the ecological momentary assessment protocol. Null multilevel models indicated that both self-efficacy and the quality of life varied over time, with around 35% of total variance explained by within-person variability, which suggests that there are intraindividual fluctuations over time. Results indicated that, for the self-efficacy model, people reporting from home had higher levels of self-efficacy than those outside the home (β=-3.8, 95% CI -6.4 to -1.3). In the quality of life model, there was increasing levels of quality of life throughout the day (afternoon: β=2.0, 95% CI 0.8-3.2, evening: β=3.9, 95% CI 2.6-5.2).

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use ecological momentary assessment in this population. These findings indicate that, among people with a stoma, self-efficacy and quality of life do vary from moment to moment. Furthermore, contextual factors such as location and time of day are associated with self-efficacy and quality of life. There is a need to explore how future self-management interventions could enhance self-efficacy to self-manage outside of the home environment, with the potential for more dynamic and tailored interventions.

Keywords: abdomen; app; bowel cancer; bowel disease; clinical; colostomy; daily routine; digital health; ecological momentary assessment; ileostomy; inflammatory bowel disease; intervention; mHealth; mobile application; multilevel modelling; opening; quality of life; self-efficacy; self-management; smartphone; stigma; stoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart showing the inclusion and exclusion of participants in the study. EMA: ecological momentary assessment.

Similar articles

References

    1. Taylor P. An introduction to stomas: reasons for their formation. Nurs Times. 2005;101(29):63–64. Medline. - PubMed
    1. Claessens I, Probert R, Tielemans C, et al. The ostomy life study: the everyday challenges faced by people living with a stoma in a snapshot. Gastrointestinal Nursing. 2015 Jun 2;13(5):18–25. doi: 10.12968/gasn.2015.13.5.18. doi. - DOI
    1. Zhang H. Working status and development of enterostomal therapist in China. Chinese Journal of Nursing Education. 2005;2(1):13–14.
    1. Burch J. Exploring the conditions leading to stoma-forming surgery. Br J Nurs. 2005;14(2):94–98. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.2.17438. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stavropoulou A, Vlamakis D, Kaba E, et al. “Living with a stoma”: exploring the lived experience of patients with permanent colostomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168512. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources