Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 2;27(1):106.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02262-3.

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Hypertension: Recent Data from Clinical Trials and Implementation Approach

Affiliations
Review

Endothelin Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Hypertension: Recent Data from Clinical Trials and Implementation Approach

Revathy Manickavasagar et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The endothelin system is a highly relevant component of the pathophysiology of hypertension, which is currently unopposed by existing treatment approaches. We examined the role of dual endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of resistant hypertension.

Recent findings: The recent PRECISION trial demonstrated significant blood pressure lowering effect with the use of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in the treatment of resistant hypertension. Aprocitentan was shown to be particularly effective in patients over 75 years of age, African-American patients, and patients with diabetes and advanced CKD. There was also a decrease in proteinuria. Aprocitentan was well tolerated and the risk of fluid retention can be mitigated by close clinical monitoring and titration of diuretic therapy. Aprocitentan presents a novel treatment option for resistant hypertension, with particular efficacy noted in patient cohorts who have historically been challenging to achieve blood pressure targets in.

Keywords: Aprocitentan; Blood pressure; Endothelin receptor antagonist; Endothelin-1; Hypertension; Pharmacotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical Standards. Conflict of interest: MS was the principal investigator of the PRECISION study and received research and travel support from Idorsia, travel support and speaker fees from Medtronic, and research support from ReCor. OA was an investigator on the PRECISION study, and also reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca. AK reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca. RM has nothing to disclose. Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effects on 24-h ambulatory BP. Changes in ambulatory BP in response to placebo (blue), aprocitentan 12.5 mg (yellow), and aprocitentan 25 mg (red lines and bars) after the 4-week double blind phase (Part 1) and after double-blind withdrawal (Part 3). 24-h profiles (upper panels) demonstrate BP reduction with both doses of aprocitentan compared to placebo across the 24-h period. Absolute BP changes depicted in the lower panels demonstrate a significant dose dependent effect, most pronounced during night-time (lower left panel). After re-randomization to placebo or continued aprocitentan 25 mg BP rose significantly in those receiving placebo, whereas BP was unchanged in those maintained on aprocitentan 25 mg (lower right panel). (Reprinted from: Schlaich MP, et al. Lancet 2022;400:1927–37, with permission from Elsevier) [48]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Subgroup analysis and effects on urinary albumin excretion (UACR). Subgroup analysis revealed that aprocitentan at each dose seems particularly effective in patients above the age of 75 years, those with UACR > 300 mg/g, and in patients with an eGFR of < 60 ml/min/1.73 m.2 (Forrest plot left panel). The impact on UACR is summarized in the right panel demonstrating significant and clinically meaningful reduction in UACR with both doses after the double-blind phase. In the single-blind phase the 30% reduction in UACR was maintained. After re-randomization UACR rose in those on placebo, but remined unchanged in those on continued aprocitentan 25 mg. (Reprinted from: Schlaich MP, et al. Lancet 2022;400:1927–37, with permission from Elsevier) [48]

Similar articles

References

    1. Doumas M, Imprialos KP, Kallistratos MS, Manolis AJ. Recent advances in understanding and managing resistant/refractory hypertension. F1000Res. 2020;9:F1000 Faculty Rev–169. 10.12688/f1000research.21669.1.
    1. De Nicola L, Gabbai FB, Agarwal R, et al. Prevalence and prognostic role of resistant hypertension in chronic kidney disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2461–7. - PubMed
    1. Irvin MR, Booth JN 3rd, Shimbo D, et al. Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension and risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:405–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muntner P, Davis BR, Cushman WC, et al. Treatment-resistant hypertension and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Hypertension. 2014;64:1012–21. - PubMed
    1. Sim JJ, Bhandari SK, Shi J, et al. Comparative risk of renal, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in controlled, uncontrolled resistant, and nonresistant hypertension. Kidney Int. 2015;88:622–32. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms