Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01593-5. Online ahead of print.

Photon-Counting Detector CT Allows Abdominal Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging at Lower Kiloelectron Volt Level with Lower Noise Using Lower Radiation Dose: A Prospective Matched Study Compared to Energy-Integrating Detector CT

Affiliations

Photon-Counting Detector CT Allows Abdominal Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging at Lower Kiloelectron Volt Level with Lower Noise Using Lower Radiation Dose: A Prospective Matched Study Compared to Energy-Integrating Detector CT

Huan Zhang et al. J Imaging Inform Med. .

Abstract

Our study aimed to assess the image quality of lower kiloelectron volt (keV) level abdominal virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) with lower radiation dose on photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT), in comparison to energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT). We prospectively included three matched groups, each with 59 participants, to undergo contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans using EID-CT with full-dose (EID_FD), PCD-CT with full-dose (PCD_FD), and PCD-CT with low-dose (PCD_LD) protocols, respectively. The data of portal-venous phase were reconstructed into VMI at 40, 50, 60, and 70 keV, respectively. The standard deviation of CT values in liver parenchyma was measured as image noise. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver parenchyma and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of liver-portal vein were calculated. Three radiologists assessed the image noise, vessel sharpness, and overall quality, and rated the hepatic lesion conspicuity if possible. Our study found that the PCD_LD significantly reduced the radiation dose than EID_FD or PCD_FD (p < 0.001). The noise was significantly decreased by PCD_FD and PCD_LD compared to EID_FD, but SNR values were significantly increased (p ≤ 0.006). The CNR values were significantly increased by PCD_FD and PCD_LD compared to EID_FD in VMI at 40 keV and 50 keV (p ≤ 0.010). The ratings of image noise, vessel sharpness, overall quality, and lesion conspicuity were significantly greater in PCD_FD and PCD_LD compared to EID_FD (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference detected in rating of lesion conspicuity between PCD_FD and PCD_LD (p ≥ 0.259). In conclusion, PCD-CT allows abdominal VMI with lower keV and lower noise using lower radiation dose, to provide better visualization of the hepatic lesions.

Keywords: Image enhancement; Image reconstruction; Multidetector computed tomography; Radiation dosage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (No. 2015–76). Consent to Participate: Written informed consent from all participants were received. Consent fo Publication: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images of Figs. 5 and 6, and those in the Supplementary Material. Competing interests: Ms. Zhihan Xu is an employee of Siemens Healthineers. However, she neither had access nor control on the data acquisition and analysis. Dr. Jingyu Zhong acknowledges his position as a member of the Scientific Editorial Board of European Radiology, Insights into Imaging, American Journal of Roentgenology, and BMC Medical Imaging. All other authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Martin SS et al (2019) Review of clinical applications for virtual monoenergetic dual-energy CT. Radiology 293(2):260–271. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182297 - DOI - PubMed
    1. D’Angelo T, Cicero G, Mazziotti S et al (2019) Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 92(1098):20180546. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180546 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Leng S, Toia GV, Hoodeshenas S et al (2024) Standardizing technical parameters and terms for abdominopelvic photon-counting CT: laying the groundwork for innovation and evidence sharing. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04342-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellini D, Gupta S, Ramirez-Giraldo JC et al (2017) Use of a noise optimized monoenergetic algorithm for patient-size independent selection of an optimal energy level during dual-energy CT of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 41(1):39-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Cecco CN, Caruso D, Schoepf UJ et al (2018) A noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of late hepatic arterial phase dual-energy CT for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions. Eur Radio 28(8):3393-3404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5313-6 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources