Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025:2954:3-26.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4698-4_1.

Profiling Histone Modifications in Differentiating Mouse Spermatogonia with CUT&Tag

Affiliations

Profiling Histone Modifications in Differentiating Mouse Spermatogonia with CUT&Tag

Benjamin William Walters et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2025.

Abstract

Paternal histone modifications are extensively remodeled during mammalian spermatogenesis. This remodeling is significant because histone modifications encode gene regulatory information important for fertility and potentially for development in the next generation. Most insight into these epigenetic changes has been gleaned from chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq analysis of male germ cells during the meiotic and postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis due to their abundance in seminiferous tubules and long-standing methods for their purification. However, there is a paucity of research defining the epigenetic landscape of earlier spermatogenic populations, including spermatogonia, mainly because cell yields are low after purification, resulting in suboptimal conditions for ChIP-seq experiments. The recent emergence of Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) as a tool to profile genome-wide histone modifications in low numbers of cells offers promising opportunities to overcome the limitations of ChIP-seq analysis in spermatogonia. Here, we describe a protocol that combines fluorescence-activated cell sorting with an optimized CUT&Tag workflow for as few as 50,000 dissociated, sorted cells to generate high-quality and reproducible datasets that faithfully capture enrichment of histone modifications in differentiating spermatogonia. This protocol will enable researchers to investigate the epigenetics of premeiotic cells in the male germ line easily and robustly.

Keywords: CUT&Tag; Chromatin; Epigenetics; Epigenomics; Flow cytometry; Histone modification; Spermatogonia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. de Rooij DG, Russell LD (2000) All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl 21(6):776–798 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huckins C (1971) The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation. Anat Rec 169(3):533–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091690306 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rooij DG (2017) The nature and dynamics of spermatogonial stem cells. Development 144(17):3022–3030. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.146571 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rooij DG (2001) Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction 121(3):347–354. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ehmcke J, Schlatt S (2006) A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates. Reproduction 132(5):673–680. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.01081 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources