Profiling Histone Modifications in Differentiating Mouse Spermatogonia with CUT&Tag
- PMID: 40601267
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4698-4_1
Profiling Histone Modifications in Differentiating Mouse Spermatogonia with CUT&Tag
Abstract
Paternal histone modifications are extensively remodeled during mammalian spermatogenesis. This remodeling is significant because histone modifications encode gene regulatory information important for fertility and potentially for development in the next generation. Most insight into these epigenetic changes has been gleaned from chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq analysis of male germ cells during the meiotic and postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis due to their abundance in seminiferous tubules and long-standing methods for their purification. However, there is a paucity of research defining the epigenetic landscape of earlier spermatogenic populations, including spermatogonia, mainly because cell yields are low after purification, resulting in suboptimal conditions for ChIP-seq experiments. The recent emergence of Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) as a tool to profile genome-wide histone modifications in low numbers of cells offers promising opportunities to overcome the limitations of ChIP-seq analysis in spermatogonia. Here, we describe a protocol that combines fluorescence-activated cell sorting with an optimized CUT&Tag workflow for as few as 50,000 dissociated, sorted cells to generate high-quality and reproducible datasets that faithfully capture enrichment of histone modifications in differentiating spermatogonia. This protocol will enable researchers to investigate the epigenetics of premeiotic cells in the male germ line easily and robustly.
Keywords: CUT&Tag; Chromatin; Epigenetics; Epigenomics; Flow cytometry; Histone modification; Spermatogonia.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Quantitative CUT&Tag for Epigenomic Profiling of Mouse Germ Cells.Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2954:27-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4698-4_2. Methods Mol Biol. 2025. PMID: 40601268
-
KDM6A/UTX promotes spermatogenic gene expression across generations and is not required for male fertility†.Biol Reprod. 2024 Feb 10;110(2):391-407. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad141. Biol Reprod. 2024. PMID: 37861693 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamic epigenomic landscape and gene regulatory networks during embryonic development in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) as revealed by histone modification profiling using CUT&Tag.Epigenetics Chromatin. 2025 Aug 4;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13072-025-00615-4. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2025. PMID: 40760451 Free PMC article.
-
Scalable single-cell profiling of chromatin modifications with sciCUT&Tag.Nat Protoc. 2024 Jan;19(1):83-112. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00905-9. Epub 2023 Nov 7. Nat Protoc. 2024. PMID: 37935964 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multiplexed chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing for quantitative study of histone modifications and chromatin factors.Nat Protoc. 2025 Mar;20(3):779-809. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01058-z. Epub 2024 Oct 3. Nat Protoc. 2025. PMID: 39363107 Review.
References
-
- Huckins C (1971) The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation. Anat Rec 169(3):533–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091690306 - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Rooij DG (2017) The nature and dynamics of spermatogonial stem cells. Development 144(17):3022–3030. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.146571 - DOI - PubMed
-
- de Rooij DG (2001) Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Reproduction 121(3):347–354. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1210347 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ehmcke J, Schlatt S (2006) A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates. Reproduction 132(5):673–680. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.01081 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources