Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0321982.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321982. eCollection 2025.

Measles vaccines and non-specific effects on mortality or morbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Measles vaccines and non-specific effects on mortality or morbidity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Louise A Fournais et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: This review evaluates the hypothesis of beneficial non-specific effects of the standard-titre measles vaccine.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Trials included standard or high-titre live attenuated measles containing vaccines compared to other vaccines or placebo. The primary outcomes were mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes were infections, antibiotic use, atopy, allergies, asthma, and atopic dermatitis.

Findings: 23 articles were included in this systematic review. Mortality: Two doses of measles vaccine vs. only one dose showed no significant effect on mortality; risk ratio (RR) = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.78 to 1.41), p = 0.76. The analysis was based on a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 25% and a control group event rate of 2.32% as measured in the actual trials included in the analysis. In males, the association was rejected: RR = 1.09 (0.86 to 1.37), p = 0.47. In females, the association was not rejected at 25%,but was at 33% level: RR = 1.0 (0.64 to 1.54), p = 0.99. Morbidity: Overall, the hypothesis was rejected: RR = 0.94 (0.80 to 1.10), p = 0.43. The rejection was sustained for both sexes: females RR = 0.95 (0.77 to 1.18), p = 0.6; males RR = 0.92 (0.83 to 1.03), p = 0.13.

Interpretation: Based on evidence from randomised controlled trials, this systematic literature review and meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis of non-specific effects of standard-titre measles containing vaccines. Trial Sequential Analysis indicated that the meta-analysis included sufficient data to reach this conclusion.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022344473.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA.
Flowchart of the selection process.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plot: Mortality.
Forest plot of adjusted mortality estimates from original trials. Results shown for both fixed effect and random effects models.
Fig 3
Fig 3. TSA: Mortality.
Pooled Effect: RR = 1·05 (CI: 0·78 to 1·41, p = 0·76), Q = 5·71 (p = 0·06), I2 = 0·65, D2 = 0·67.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Forest plot: Morbidity.
Forest plot based on adjusted estimates from original trials of morbidity. Calculated using fixed and random effects models.
Fig 5
Fig 5. TSA: Morbidity.
Pooled Effect: RR = 0·94 (C.I: 0·80 to 1·10, p = 0·43), Q = 1·27 (p = 0·26), I2 = 0·21, D2 = 0·24.

Similar articles

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention C. Measles epidemiology. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/newsroom/topics/measles/index.html. 2019. Accessed 2024 January 1
    1. Wallinga J, Heijne JCM, Kretzschmar M. A measles epidemic threshold in a highly vaccinated population. PLoS Med. 2005;2(11):e316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper, April 2017 - Recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):219–22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.066 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aaby P, Bukh J, Lisse IM, Smits AJ. Measles vaccination and child mortality. Lancet. 1981;2(8237):93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)90443-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aaby P, Jensen TG, Hansen HL, Kristiansen H, Thårup J, Poulsen A, et al. Trial of high-dose Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine in Guinea-Bissau: protective efficacy. Lancet. 1988;2(8615):809–11. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92780-8 - DOI - PubMed

Substances