Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0321428.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321428. eCollection 2025.

Oral microbiota interactions with titanium implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of peri-implantitis

Affiliations

Oral microbiota interactions with titanium implants: A pilot in-vivo and in-vitro study on the impact of peri-implantitis

Priyadharshini Sekar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Dental implant therapy is a reliable approach for restoring missing teeth, offering functional and aesthetic benefits in suitable clinical cases. However, there is still a 1.9-11% implant failure rate globally. Oral microbiota plays a significant role in implant failure and peri-implant infections. Hence the impact of oral microbiota on titanium dental implants, particularly in the context of dysbiosis and peri-implant diseases, was investigated by in-vivo and in-vitro methods in this study.

Materials and methods: This pilot study aimed to investigate the role of oral microbiota in peri-implant diseases associated with titanium implants. For the in-vivo study, oral microbiota was collected from titanium and hydroxyapatite (tooth-mimicking) discs placed in a custom-made intra-oral device worn by four healthy subjects. Biofilm formation, pathobionts, and bacterial diversity were assessed using DAPI staining, qPCR, and next generation sequencing (NGS)-16S rRNA sequencing. For the in-vitro study scanning electron microscopy was employed to examine the effect of oral pathogens on titanium implants.

Results: The study found enhanced biofilm formation on titanium implants compared to controls (p < 0.0002). Systematic colonization by Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces naeslundii, Veillonella parvula, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was observed. An abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, with a decrease in Proteobacteria on titanium implants was observed by NGS. SEM showed corrosion and damage to titanium implants caused by oral pathogens.

Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the use of titanium-based dental implants promotes oral microbiota dysbiosis, tipping the scale towards oral pathogens, which in turn contributes to the damage of the titanium implant surface. Increased biofilm formation of periodontal pathogens and microbial dysbiosis may play a role in implant failure and peri-implant diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The dental device fitted with three holes on either side, fitted with plastic wells.
Fig.2
Fig.2. Fluorescent microscopic images of DAPI stained bacterial biofilm on (a) Empty well, (b) hydroxyapatite, (c) Titanium implant.
Fig.3
Fig.3. Fold expression of SO- Streptococcus oralis, AN – Actinomyces naeslundii, VP – Veillonella parvula, AA – Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, PG – Porphyromonas gingivalis, FN – Fusobacterium nucleatum on TDI and HA.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relative abundance in Phyla and Genus between (A) TDI (Ti) and (B) HA.
Fig 5
Fig 5. (A) Alpha diversity and (B) beta diversity between titanium implant (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) indicated by the Shannon index and Weighted Unifrac distance respectively.
Fig 6
Fig 6. SEM of effect of set 1 – bacterial polyculture of initial colonizers, set 2 – bacterial polyculture of initial colonizers and late colonizer on titanium dental implant.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kheder W, Al Kawas S, Khalaf K, Samsudin AR. Impact of tribocorrosion and titanium particles release on dental implant complications - A narrative review. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021;57:182–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.09.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45 Suppl 20:S286–91. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12957 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sridhar S, Wang F, Wilson TG Jr, Valderrama P, Palmer K, Rodrigues DC. Multifaceted roles of environmental factors toward dental implant performance: Observations from clinical retrievals and in vitro testing. Dent Mater. 2018;34(11):e265–79. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.299 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen L, Tong Z, Luo H, Qu Y, Gu X, Si M. Titanium particles in peri-implantitis: distribution, pathogenesis and prospects. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1). doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00256-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nandakumar V, Chittaranjan S, Kurian VM, Doble M. Characteristics of bacterial biofilm associated with implant material in clinical practice. Pol J. 2013;45(2):137–52.

LinkOut - more resources