Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jul 8;86(1):32-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.048.

Defibrillation Testing During Implantation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Defibrillation Testing During Implantation of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

Fawzi Kerkouri et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: Defibrillation testing (DT) remains recommended during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation due to limited supporting evidence.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term impact of DT during S-ICD implantation.

Methods: The HONEST (coHOrte fraNcaise des dEfibrillateurs Sous cuTanés) study is a nationwide, ongoing observational study, including all S-ICD recipients in France (2012-2019). Five-year endpoints were centrally adjudicated, and propensity score-weighted analyses compared outcomes by DT status.

Results: Among 4,924 patients, DT was performed in 4,066 (82.6%), decreasing from 85.4% (2012-2014) to 66.9% in 2019 (P < 0.001). Nontested patients were older (51.2 vs 49.6 years; P = 0.007), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37.6% vs 43.3%; P < 0.001), and were more frequently implanted for primary prevention (68.0% vs 62.4%; P = 0.002) and structural heart disease (84.9% vs 76.8%; P < 0.001). DT-related complications occurred in 0.1%, including 2 deaths. Failure rate was 1.0%, with 87.8% undergoing corrective reinterventions. Independent predictors of DT failure were elevated shock impedance (≥89 Ω; OR: 4.60; 95% CI: 2.32-9.66; P < 0.001) and obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2; OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.01-4.55; P = 0.007). After adjustment, DT omission was not associated with increased risks of overall mortality (HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.86-1.61; P = 0.313), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.70-1.56; P = 0.846), sudden cardiac death (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.04-1.72; P = 0.167), and appropriate (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78-1.30; P = 0.945) or inappropriate shocks (HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.78-1.23; P = 0.865). Combined rates of ineffective shocks or undetected ventricular arrhythmias were similar (0.05 vs 0.06 per 100 person-years).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DT can be safely omitted in the majority of S-ICD recipients, whereas selective DT may be considered in higher-risk subgroups. (S-ICD French Cohort Study (HONEST); NCT05302115).

Keywords: defibrillation failure; ineffective shock; shock impedance; subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator; sudden cardiac death.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures The HONEST study was conducted by the French Institute of Health and Medical Research and funded by the French Federation of Cardiology and the French Society of Cardiology. Boston Scientific, the manufacturer of the studied device, had no role involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or preparation of this report. Since 2020, Boston Scientific has supported the organization of the annual HONEST investigators’ meetings. Fawzi Kerkouri, Mina Ait Said, Marc Badoz, Pierre Bordachar, Laure Champ Rigot, Philippe Chevalier, Jean Claude Deharo, Laurent Fauchier, Estelle Gandjbakhch, Edouard Gitenay, Jean-Baptiste Gourraud, Benoît Guy-Moyat, Alexis Hermida, Jérôme Hourdain, Jacon Peggy, Maxime de Guillebon, Laurence Jesel, Vincent Mansourati, Philippe Maury, Jean Luc Pasquié, Michaël Peyrol, Sylvain Ploux, Charlotte Potelle, Nicolas Sadoul, Jean Marc Sellal, and Emilie Varlet declare no relevant conflicts of interest with Boston Scientific. All other authors are consultants for and/or have received fees from Boston Scientific. The first draft of the manuscript was prepared by the first, second, and last authors, who had unrestricted access to the data, in collaboration with the HONEST Scientific Committee. The manuscript underwent thorough review and was approval by all contributing authors.

Publication types

Associated data