Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1:S0892-1997(25)00228-0.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.009. Online ahead of print.

Between Necessity and Feasibility: A Qualitative Study on How Clinicians Navigate Bedside Voice Assessment

Adrián Castillo-Allendes  1 , Jeff Searl  2 , Thea Knowles  2 , Megan Hodgman  3 , Camila Salas-Pohl  4 , Eric J Hunter  5
Affiliations

Between Necessity and Feasibility: A Qualitative Study on How Clinicians Navigate Bedside Voice Assessment

Adrián Castillo-Allendes et al. J Voice. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to provide critical insights into how speech-language pathologists (SLPs) approach bedside voice assessment in medical settings, highlighting assessment strategies, practical barriers, and the feasibility of integrating objective tools into routine care.

Methods: Twenty-five SLPs with experience in voice, swallowing, or upper airway disorders participated in semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis was applied to examine clinicians' perceptions of bedside voice assessment. Coding focused on assessment practices, barriers, research-practice translation, and the patient-centered role of voice in recovery.

Findings: Ten themes were identified across four domains: (1) clinical prioritization, (2) practical strategies, (3) research-practice gaps, and (4) patient-centered care. Clinicians consistently reported that swallowing takes precedence over voice assessment in medical care contexts due in part to workflow demands and risk prioritization. Limited access to instrumental tools and environmental constraints often led clinicians to rely on informal perceptual methods, non-standardized digital tools, and patient-reported outcomes. While these methods were practical, concerns were raised about their validity, particularly in complex inpatient populations. Many SLPs expressed frustration with the limited feasibility of implementing research-backed tools. Still, they emphasized the significance of voice for patients' emotional well-being and identity, describing vocal recovery as a marker of broader rehabilitation progress.

Conclusions: Despite systemic and logistical constraints, clinicians recognize voice assessment as critical to holistic patient care. Current practices are shaped by necessity rather than preference. Bridging the gap between research and practice-through portable tools, validated protocols, and clinician-researcher collaboration-is essential to ensure voice assessments are both feasible and meaningful in medical contexts.

Keywords: Bedside evaluation; Clinical feasibility; Patient-centered care; Qualitative research; Speech-language pathology; Voice assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered as potential competing interests: Adrian Castillo-Allendes reports that financial support was provided by BIO Fulbright-ANID (Chile) Scholarship and Charles J. Strosacker Foundation Research Fund for Health and Risk Communication. Eric J Hunter reports that financial support was provided by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) under Award Number R01DC012315. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Huang L, Athanasiadis T, Schar M, Woods C, Bassiouni A, Martin S, et al. Bedside voice assessments cannot be used as a screening test for laryngeal injury following prolonged intubation in an intensive care population. Australian Journal of Otolaryngology 2022;5. 10.21037/ajo-21-42. - DOI
    1. Zaga CJ, Cigognini B, Vogel AP, Berney S. Outcome measurement tools for communication, voice and speech intelligibility in the ICU and their clinimetric properties: A systematic review. J Intensive Care Soc 2022;23:459–72. 10.1177/1751143720963757. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Scope of Practice in SpeechLanguage Pathology [Scope of Practice] 2016.
    1. Newman H, Clunie G, Wallace S, Smith C, Martin D, Pattison N. What matters most to adults with a tracheostomy in ICU and the implications for clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review and metasynthesis. Journal of Critical Care 2022;72:154145. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154145. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources