Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23278.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06861-6.

The effect of fear and compassion on human willingness to protect predators and prey

Pavol Prokop  1   2 , Jozef Balcerčík  3 , Patrick Bonin  4 , Gaëtan Thiebaut  4 , Zuzana Provazník  3 , Milan Zvarík  5 , Martina Zvaríková  3 , Peter Fedor  3
Affiliations

The effect of fear and compassion on human willingness to protect predators and prey

Pavol Prokop et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Human perception of predators is extremely important because the decline in biodiversity requires greater involvement from the public in species conservation. We conducted an online study in Slovakia with 225 adult participants (151 women; mean age = 24 years), who viewed a series of short videos depicting predator-prey interactions in which the predator either won or lost the encounter. Most of the predators depicted were large mammals (e.g., leopards, lions), one of which was a snake. We examined participants' compassion towards both the predator and prey and their willingness to protect these species. Participants exhibited greater compassion towards predators when they lost, whereas prey received higher compassion scores when they lost than when they won. Prey generally received higher compassion scores than predators. Fear of perceived animals was negatively correlated with compassion for predators and prey. Perceived fear and compassion for both predators and prey were positively correlated with the willingness to protect them (WTP), although these correlations were negative for the majority of predator species. WTP was not significantly influenced by the outcome of the encounter. Snakes, often considered prototypical stimuli for human fear, elicited less compassion and lower WTP compared to mammalian predators. We conclude that human sensitivity to physical interactions between predators and prey does not necessarily translate into a willingness to protect these animals. Conservation strategies need to consider the emotional and cognitive biases people hold toward different species. By acknowledging these biases, especially fear and perceived charisma, conservation campaigns may more effectively foster public support for protecting a broader range of species.

Keywords: Animal cruelty; Emotions toward animals; Perception of predators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics declarations: This research was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University (Licence no. ECH19036). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, including the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Compassion toward predators and prey with respect to winners and losses.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Compassion toward predators and prey with respect to participant gender.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differences in compassion with respect to species and gender.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
WTP predators and prey with respect to winners and losses.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
WTP of predators and prey with respect to participant gender.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Differences in WTP of predators and prey with respect to species and gender.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Hart, D. & Sussman, R. W. in Man the Hunted: Primates, Predators, and Human Evolution. (eds Hard, D. & Sussman, R. W.) (Westview, 2008). 357 pp
    1. Isbell, L. A. The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent: why We See so Well (Harvard University Press, 2009).
    1. Babo Martins, S. et al. Ruiz de castañeda, R. Snakebite and its impact in rural communities: the need for a one health approach. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.13, e0007608. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007608 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett, H. C. Adaptations to predators and prey. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (ed. Buss, D. M.) 200–223 (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2015).
    1. Treves, A. & Palmqvist, P. Reconstructing hominin interactions with mammalian carnivores. In Primate Anti-Predator Strategies (eds Gursky, S. L. & Nekaris, K. A. I.) 355–381 (Springer, 2007).

LinkOut - more resources