Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):682.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07803-w.

Analysis of variables affecting postpartum quality of life: their relative influence and interrelationships

Carmen Paz-Pascual  1   2   3   4 , Isabel Artieta-Pinedo  5   6   7 , Paola Bully  8 , Ema-Q Group  9 , Maite Espinosa  6   9
Affiliations

Analysis of variables affecting postpartum quality of life: their relative influence and interrelationships

Carmen Paz-Pascual et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period is a time of special vulnerability and unacceptably high morbidity for the mother, which warrants in-depth study. The objective of this study is to analyze the variables affecting quality of life (QoL) during the first six months postpartum, their relative influence, and the relationships between them.

Methods: Cross-sectional study with the participation of 289 postpartum women, who answered the digital questionnaires: SF-12 for QoL; EMAeHealth for self-management of health in the postpartum, which assesses: incontinence, sexuality, breastfeeding, adaptation to the maternal role and mental health; and "Prescribe Healthy Life" Screening Questionnaire, which measures diet, exercise and consumption of toxic. To analyze the relationship between the variables and their relative influence on QoL, a structural equation model was built.

Results: Depression (β=-0.640; 90%CI: (-0.670)-(-0.505); p = 0.006), partner support (β = 0.331; 90%CI:0.217-0.424; p = 0.003), parental self-efficacy (β = 0.219; 90%CI:0.134-0.309; p = 0.001) and physical QoL (β=-0.223; 90%CI: (-0.294)-(-0.142); p = 0.002) are related to the mental dimension of QoL. Partner support also influences the breastfeeding self-efficacy (β = 0.28; 90%CI:0.197-0.373; p = 0.002), sexual satisfaction (β = 0.48; 90%CI:0.38-0.56; p = 0.03), body dissatisfaction (β=-0.155; 90%CI: (-0.27)-(-0.04); p = 0.031), and parental self-efficacy (β = 0.170; 90%CI:0.027-0.344; p = 0.045), which indirectly affect QoL. Depressive symptoms (β=-0.126; 90%CI: (-0.218)-(-0.026); p = 0.044) and smoking (β=-0.224; 90%CI: (-0.314)-(-0.132); p = 0.002) affect the physical component of QoL.

Conclusions: This study explains the influence of the variables involved in QoL after childbirth and their interrelationship, providing a graphical representation that facilitates a comprehensive understanding. This knowledge forces us, as midwives, to review perinatal and postpartum care with the aim of paying special attention to partner support and depressive symptoms.

Keywords: Mental quality of life; Physical quality of life; Postpartum; Quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Basque Clinical Ethics Committee (file number PI2019110) approved the study in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Prior to participating in the study, all the participating women were informed of the study and an informed consent was provided by all the participants for this study. The consent and information sheet had been previously approved by the Ethics Committee. This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, which governs research involving human subjects and/or the use of human data. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Final model of relationships between variables (standardized regression coefficients) in the group of postpartum women
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Sheikh J, Allotey J, Kew T, et al. Vulnerabilities and reparative strategies during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period: moving from rhetoric to action. The lancet series, maternal health in the perinatal period and beyond 2. eClinicalMedicine. 2024;67:102264. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.10226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Souza JP, Day LT, Rezende-Gomes AC, et al. A global analysis of the determinants of maternal health and transitions in maternal mortality. The lancet series, maternal health in the perinatal period and beyond 1. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12:e306–16. 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00468-0. - PubMed
    1. Souza JP, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Santos LLD et al. Maternal Mortality: An Eco-Social Phenomenon that Calls for Systemic Action. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42(4):169–173. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710041. Epub 2020 Apr 24. PMID: 32330957; PMCID: PMC10316832. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Volkert A, Bach L, Hagenbeck C et al. Obstetric interventions’ effects on the birthing experience.bmc pregnancy and childbirth. 2024; 24:508. 10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perera E, Chou S, Cousins N, et al. Women’s experiences of trauma, the psychosocial impact and health service needs during the perinatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;197. 10.1186/s12884-023-05509-5. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources