Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1019.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06375-7.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of teeth displacement patterns under four anchorage designs for maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners: a real-case based simulation study

Affiliations

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of teeth displacement patterns under four anchorage designs for maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners: a real-case based simulation study

Huanhuan Chen et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To explore the three-dimensional (3D) displacement patterns of maxillary molar distalization using clear aligners (CA) under four anchorage designs and provide clinical guidelines for optimal traction methods.

Materials and methods: A 3D finite element model was constructed based on CBCT and digital models from an adult patient requiring maxillary molar distalization. The model included cortical bone, cancellous bone, periodontal ligament, teeth, CA, and mini-screws. Four anchorage designs were simulated during sequential distal movement of bilateral maxillary second molars, first molars, and second premolars: (a) intramaxillary anchorage, (b) intermaxillary anchorage, (c) buccal mini-screw anchorage, and (d) palatal mini-screw anchorage. Displacement patterns of anterior and molar teeth were analyzed using ANSYS software and compared to the patient's actual maxillary dentition movement.

Results: Most teeth's actual displacement aligned with finite element predictions, except for central incisors, which showed mesial tipping instead of the simulated distal tipping. In the sequence-specific simulations: (1) Second molars only: All groups exhibited labial tipping and extrusion of anterior teeth (greater in Groups (a) and (b)), distal and buccal tipping with intrusion of second molars, and buccal tipping with extrusion of first molars (distal tipping in Groups (c) and (d), mesial in Groups (a) and (b)). (2) Second and first molars simultaneously: Anterior teeth showed reduced labial tipping, with palatal tipping and intrusion of right canines in Groups (c) and (d). All groups displayed distal tipping and intrusion of molars, with palatal tipping in second molars and buccal tipping in first molars. (3) Second premolars initiated: Anterior teeth in Groups (c) and (d) exhibited reduced labial tipping and extrusion, even with some palatal tipping and intrusion. Second molars in Groups (a) and (b) showed mesial, buccal tipping, and extrusion, while first molars in all groups and second molars in Groups (c) and (d) showed distal, palatal tipping, and intrusion. No significant differences in torque or vertical control were observed between buccal and palatal mini-screw anchorage.

Conclusions: Compared to intramaxillary or intermaxillary anchorage, the combination of mini-screws anchorage has a better effect on the torque control of anterior teeth, which also helps to promote the distal movement of molars. While no significant differences were observed in the torque and vertical control of anterior teeth or molars between buccal and palatal mini-screws, the findings underscore the versatility of mini-screw anchorage in accommodating individual patient anatomies. Notably, the displacement patterns of bilateral maxillary teeth were not always symmetrical, highlighting the need for personalized treatment planning and close monitoring during orthodontic therapy.

Keywords: Anchorage control; Clear aligners; Finite element analysis; Maxillary molar distalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval for this study was obtained by the biomedical ethics committee of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (PKUSSIRB No.202058139). The patient recruited in this study has signed informed consent forms before treatment. All the procedures were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Finite element models for four working conditions: (a) intramaxillary anchorage group; b intermaxillary anchorage group; c buccal mini-screw anchorage group; d palatal mini-screw anchorage group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The comparison of displacement patterns between the finite element simulation results and actual displacement results
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Four groups of 3D displacement of anterior teeth in five stages: In each bar chart, the four colors correspond to Blue: Group a (intramaxillary), Orange: Group b (intermaxillary), Yellow: Group c (buccal mini-screw), and Green: Group d (palatal mini-screw), respectively. The X-axis coordinates are the right canine, right lateral incisor, right central incisor, left central incisor, left lateral incisor, and left canine, respectively. The Y-axis coordinate displays the movement magnitude of each tooth. A Mesial-distal direction: positive represents distal tipping; B Labial-palatal direction: positive represents labial tipping; C Gingival-occlusal direction: positive represents intrusion
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Four groups of 3D displacement of molars in five stages: In each bar chart, the four colors correspond to Blue: Group a (intramaxillary), Orange: Group b (intermaxillary), Yellow: Group c (buccal mini-screw), and Green: Group d (palatal mini-screw), respectively. The X-axis coordinates are the right second molar, right first molar, left first molar, and left second molar, respectively. The Y-axis coordinate displays the movement magnitude of each tooth. A Mesial-distal direction: positive represents distal tipping; B Labial-palatal direction: positive represents labial tipping; C Gingival-occlusal direction: positive represents intrusion

Similar articles

References

    1. Galan-Lopez L, Barcia-Gonzalez J, Plasencia E. A systematic review of the accuracy and efficiency of dental movements with Invisalign(R). Korean J Orthod. 2019;49(3):140–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simon M, Keilig L, Schwarze J, Jung BA, Bourauel C. Treatment outcome and efficacy of an aligner technique - regarding incisor torque, premolar derotation and molar distalization. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Anto V, Valletta R, Ferretti R, Bucci R, Kirlis R, Rongo R. Predictability of Maxillary Molar Distalization and Derotation with Clear Aligners: A Prospective Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):2941. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caruso S, Nota A, Ehsani S, Maddalone E, Ojima K, Tecco S. Impact of molar teeth distalization with clear aligners on occlusal vertical dimension: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu X, Wang W, Gao J, Qin W, Wen Y, Luo H, Ma Y, Jin Z. Actual contribution ratio of maxillary and mandibular molars for total molar relationship correction during maxillary molar sequential distalization using clear aligners with Class II elastics: A finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023;164(4):e106–20. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources