Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders
- PMID: 40605462
- PMCID: PMC12322341
- DOI: 10.1177/13872877251352103
Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders
Abstract
BackgroundGenetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) along with Alzheimer's disease (AD), is one of the most prevalent early-onset dementias. The differential diagnosis of FTD from primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) has been challenging due to significant symptom overlap, particular as FTD often presents with prolonged psychiatric prodromes.ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate whether blood-based neurofilament light chain (NfL) can differentiate genetic FTD from PPD, and to determine a global clinical cutoff to differentiate genetic FTD carriers from PPD with high specificity and sensitivity.MethodsData (ages 40-81) were obtained from FTD mutation carriers (GENFI; n = 474; n = 120 C9orf72, n = 114 GRN, n = 50 MAPT, n = 190 controls), and PPD (Biobanque Signature; n = 848). Blood-based NfL was measured with SIMOA HD-X (BbS) and SIMOA HD-1 (GENFI).ResultsBlood-based NfL was higher in all symptomatic mutations compared to PPD. Mildly symptomatic (0 < FTLD CDR-SOB-NM < 4) C9orf72 and GRN carriers also had higher NfL. ROC curve revealed an optimal blood-based NfL cutoff of 22.1 pg/mL (J = 0.647) to distinguish symptomatic genetic FTD from PPD (78.5% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity, AUC = 0.908). For mildly symptomatic subjects, a cutoff of 16.2 pg/mL (J = 0.601) differentiated groups with 86.7% sensitivity and 73.5% specificity (AUC = 0.870).ConclusionsNfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including C9orf72.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; biomarkers; diagnosis; frontotemporal dementia; neurofilament proteins.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: SD conducts sponsored clinical trial research (Biogen, NovoNordisk, Innodem Neurosciences, Janssen, Alnylam) and has received advisory/speaker fees (Eisai, QuRALIS, Eli Lilly). JBR provides consultancy unrelated to the current work to Asceneuron, Astronautx, Astex, Curasen, CumulusNeuro, Wave, SVHealth, and has research grants from AZ-Medimmune, Janssen, and Lilly as industry partners in the Dementias Platform UK. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures




References
-
- Ducharme S, Price BH, Larvie M, et al. Clinical approach to the differential diagnosis between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172: 827–837. - PubMed
-
- Levy JP, Bocti C, Elie D, et al. Bifrontal hypermetabolism on brain FDG-PET in a case of C9orf72-related behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2019; 31: 92–94. - PubMed
-
- Petzold A. Neurofilament phosphoforms: surrogate markers for axonal injury, degeneration and loss. J Neurol Sci 2005; 233: 183–198. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous