Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Dec;57(1):2527951.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2527951. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam combined with remifentanil for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam combined with remifentanil for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation: a randomized controlled trial

Xiao-Rui Zhou et al. Ann Med. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: There has been not study determining if remimazolam combined with remifentanil is the reasonable dosing regimen for sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI). This prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial compare efficacy and safety of sedation using different-dose remimazolam combined with remifentanil for AFOI procedure.

Method: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly assigned to five groups receiving different interventions. The Rf group received only remifentanil infusion of 0.05 mcg/kg/min, the Rm group received only remimazolam 0.6 mg/kg/h, and the RR0.2, RR0.4 and RR0.6 groups received remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min combined with remimazolam of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg/h, respectively. After intravenous infusion of studied drugs for 3 min, AFOI was carried out under airway topical anesthesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of deep sedation during AFOI procedure.

Results: Deep sedation occurred only in the Rm, RR0.4 and RR0.6 groups, with incidences of 3.3%, 17.2%, and 50.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of deep sedation in the RR0.6 group was not statistically different from that in the RR0.4 group (p > 0.05), but was higher than these in the Rf, Rm and RR0.2 groups (p < 0.05). Hypoxemia was observed only in RR0.2, RR0.4 and RR0.6 groups, with incidences of 13.3%, 44.8%, and 44.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). The recall score for AFOI procedure was significantly lower in the four remimazolam groups than in the Rf group (p < 0.005). The patients' reaction score to AFOI procedure, cough severity, incidence of tachycardia, and willingness to repeat the procedure were lower in the RR0.6 group than in the Rf and Rm groups (p < 0.005).

Conclusions: Remimazolam 0.2-0.6 mg/kg/h combined with remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min are effective and feasible dosing regimens of sedation for AFOI procedure in patients with normal airway, but the regimen including remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg/h should be the better choice for balancing efficacy and safety.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100042917. Retrieved from http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=65332 on January 31, 2021.

Keywords: Awake fiberoptic intubation; moderate sedation; remifentanil; remimazolam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The CONSORT flow diagram of the study population. Rf group, patients receiving alone remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min; Rm group, patients receiving alone remimazolam 0.6 mg/kg/h; RR0.2, RR0.4 and RR0.6 groups, patients receiving remimazolam 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg/h combined with remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The incidence of deep sedation during AFOI procedure in each group. Rf group, patients receiving alone remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min; Rm group, patients receiving alone remimazolam 0.6 mg/kg/h; RR0.2, RR0.4 and RR0.6 groups, patients receiving remimazolam 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mg/kg/h combined with remifentanil 0.05 mcg/kg/min, respectively. AFOI, awake fiberoptic intubation.

References

    1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(1):31–81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langeron O, Bourgain J-L, Francon D, et al. Difficult intubation and extubation in adult anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018;37(6):639–651. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2018.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li CW, Li YD, Tian HT, et al. Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: a randomized double-blind study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(23):3143–3148. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.170260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yousuf A, Ahad B, Mir AH, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl-midazolam combination on sedation and safety during awake fiberoptic intubation: a randomized comparative study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(4):998–1003. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_150_17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergese SD, Patrick Bender S, McSweeney TD, et al. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine with midazolam and midazolam alone for sedation during elective awake fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(1):35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.02.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources