Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 8;18(2):349-364.
doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00909-1. eCollection 2025 Jun.

The Development of a Behavior Plan Quality Assurance Instrument in a Publicly Funded System of Care

Affiliations

The Development of a Behavior Plan Quality Assurance Instrument in a Publicly Funded System of Care

Nathan Habel et al. Behav Anal Pract. .

Abstract

Quality assurance in behavior planning may best be accomplished when quality measures match governing policies that closely parallel best practice standards. This article provides an example of state government creating practice guidelines for focused behavioral services delivered in a home and community-based waiver system. We provide an overview of existing quality assurance instruments for behavior plans and share a unique quality review tool with several automated features designed to assess adherence to these practice guidelines. Considerations are offered for others with interest in policy to practice alignment, along with suggestions on how behavior analysts can successfully participate in policy making and quality assurance.

Keywords: Behavior plan scoring tool; Policy development; Quality assurance in functional behavior assessment and behavior support plans; Regulation of behavior analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors have no conflict of interest or financial gain with the development of this article or associated tool.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Considerations for policy to practice alignment and initiating quality reviews

Similar articles

References

    1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1990).
    1. Anderson, C. M., Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A. W., Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Sampson, N. K. (2014). Individual student systems evaluation tool: Version 3.0. Educational & Community Supports, University of Oregon.
    1. Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2020). Ethics for behavior analysts (4th ed.). Routledge.
    1. Banks, B. M., Shriver, M. D., Chadwell, M. R., & Allen, K. D. (2018). An examination of behavioral treatment wording on acceptability and understanding. Behavioral Interventions,33(3), 260–270. 10.1002/bin.1521
    1. Becraft, J. L., Cataldo, M. F., Yu-Lefler, H. F., Schenk, Y. A., Edelstein, M. L., & Kurtz, P. F. (2023). Correspondence between data provided by parents and trained observers about challenging behavior. Behavior Analysis: Research & Practice,23(4), 254–274. 10.1037/bar0000276

LinkOut - more resources