Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair
- PMID: 40607178
- PMCID: PMC12213473
- DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14459
Laparosocpic "Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh"-Plus: A Viable Approach for Incisional-Ventral Hernia Repair
Abstract
The current Intraperitoneal Underlay Mesh (IPUM), previously referred to as IPOM (onlay), initially faced several challenges due to design and methodological shortcomings, particularly with the use of a bridging technique without defect closure. These limitations contributed to elevated recurrence rates, mesh bulging, seroma formation, and suboptimal abdominal wall function. Although complications such as adhesions, bowel erosion, fistula formation, and mesh migration were rare, they were mostly associated with non-composite or poorly designed meshes and inadequate fixation. These concerns led to growing skepticism regarding intraperitoneal mesh placement and a shift in preference toward retrorectus mesh positioning. Since 2007, the evolution of IPUM+ techniques-where the "+" denotes primary defect closure combined with the use of advanced composite meshes, has led to significantly improved outcomes. Long-term studies, meta-analyses, and randomized trials have demonstrated better functional results, reduced complications, and broader acceptance among surgeons and patients. These advancements have positioned IPUM+ as a reliable and effective option, especially when long-term outcomes of alternative techniques such as eTEP, ventral TAPP, or robotic approaches remain under long term follow up evaluation. IPUM+ continues to serve as a valuable technique for small to moderate or recurrent ventral hernias when performed by experienced surgeons. Future directions should aim to define its role in personalized hernia care, integrating hybrid methods and emerging technologies for complex repairs.
Keywords: augmentation technique; incisional ventral hernia repair; intraperitoneal onlay mesh; laparoscopic IPUM+; ventral hernia repair.
Copyright © 2025 Chelala and Jacob.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30209805 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38424284 Free PMC article.
-
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18646155 Free PMC article.
-
Only-Glue Fixation in Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair of Midline Ventral Hernias: Technical Aspects and Short-Term Results of 40 Patients.Cureus. 2025 Jun 4;17(6):e85324. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85324. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40621312 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15842951
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources